Denominations are often despised. Even many Christians outside of the independent Baptist movement frown upon such formal, concrete institutions. Indeed, mainline denominations have been trending left over the last hundred years and more, so some of these reactions are understandable.
But with the proliferation of non-denominational churches, and in Baptist circles, the mass exodus of independent churches from the denominations, a strange phenomenon has occurred. Rather than remaining aloof from any formal institutional organization, these churches have banded together in a vast array of associations, fellowships and networks. The problem with some of these new fellowships and organizations may be their newness. A forgetfulness of the past and a devotion to the pragmatic and the new, combine to make such fellowships especially prone to parochialism or doctrinal drift.
In all reality, looking back at the denominations we left, we find many of the same things that we have sought after today. Denominations have a built in missions organization. They have longstanding partnerships among like-minded churches. They offer help to church planters and pool resources for the training of men for the ministry. They also have a connection to the work of God in the past, and a wealth of experience from both the past and the present, with which to bring to bear on today’s challenges.
Certainly some denominations have totally capitulated to doctrinal error. I am not advocating the usefulness of that kind of partnership. Instead I am pointing out that many Baptist and Presbyterian denominations exist which can provide help to churches and a connection with an orthodox, confessional history. Other denominations are also vibrant and faithful, and deserve consideration especially if you plan to plant a church or go to the mission field.
Denominations in and of themselves are not necessarily hierarchical structures where all autonomy is lost when a church joins up with them. Nor is a partnership in this sense a full endorsement of all the activities under the tent that the denomination supports. The beauty of denominations is the doctrinal core that you must unite around to join, as well as the freedom and expansiveness to allow varieties of method and practice, and differences of opinion on lesser doctrinal matters. Denominations stand ready to allow churches to unite around the Gospel, and partner in the work of missions.
Every denomination is not created equal. But a good many doctrinally sound denominations could benefit by the presence of more member churches that are solid in faith and devoted to mission.
My thoughts along these lines were recently spurred on by reading a very helpful article by Ed Stetzer on the subject from this month’s Christianity Today. It is the cover article and is entitled, “Life in These Old Bones.” The subtitle explains, “If you’re interested in doing mission, there could hardly be a better tool than denominations.”
I encourage you to read Stetzer’s article and take some thought about the value of denominations. Don’t be ready to cast stones and praise your independence. Thank God for faithful denominations and the churches that founded them.
I think Fundamentalists are very ‘denominational’ in practice. This question is closely related to your last post about separation – Fundies are constantly examining their associates to determine who is and who is not ‘on their team.’ They don’t call it a denomination, of course; but the next time you visit a Fundy church, ask the teens what Bible college they are going to. Ask the newer church staff members where they went and where recent grads went. From this one basic question, you’ll have a pretty good idea who they get in to speak, what missions they support, what big name Pastor they admire, what programs they emulate, what time of year they have their missions conference, what time Sunday School starts, what contests they will have during ‘soul-winning’ Fall program, etc.
Real denominations are built around a doctrinal standard, but because Fundies eschew doctrinal standards, the standard becomes ‘what the Pastor thinks.’ SO, the Pastor hammers on his hobby horses from the pulpit, rips on other Fundies that don’t see it the same way, and they start drawing up the lines.
Good thoughts, Andrew. You are very right. De-facto denominations are what is the norm in fundamentalism. And instead of a doctrinal center it’s a methodological or traditional taboo list which centers the fellowship.
As a minister in a denomination, I’m often a little irritated by the rather sanctimonious sneering that is directed at those of us who minister in a denominational framework. Personally I’m thankful that I minister in such a set up.
Ears hear the Father Heart of God…
Mouths proclaim the Word of God…
Feet carry the gospel to far off lands…
Eyes are watchmen on the walls…
Hands gather and bring in…
Arms hold and welcome the hurting…
And there is so much more…
We all have a part in the body! Isn’t it interesting that our bodies made in the likeness of God, have multiples of the parts mentioned above, except for the mouth…
One True Word…
One True Spirit…
One True Body…
Multiple WAYS to serve…*: )
the problem with denominations, that you did not address, is that they are exclusive, being a member of one denomination means not being a member of another, christian associations should consider all christians nominal members. the only time a christian organization should say to another person “you are not a member of us” is when they believe that person is not a christian. instead of denominations or groups we should have things-the-body-of-Christ-is-doing.