I recently posted my book review of Republocrat by Carl Trueman which makes the point that Christianity doesn’t have an exclusive bent to either of the major American political parties. Christianity isn’t American after all.
I thought I’d follow this up with a link to a fantastic post on the theme of Christianity & politics that I just found over at the Gospel Coalition Blog. It actually is about a month old now, but links to a 70 minute sermon on the topic from Mark Dever, who happens to pastor Capitol Hill Baptist Church in Washington, D.C. (where both Democrats and Republicans meet to worship, mind you).
Here’s an excerpt from Collin Hansen’s post of the same title as this post. I encourage you to read the whole thing, and download Dever’s sermon to boot.
…God’s ways often surpass our understanding. We cannot manipulate him to baptize our pet causes. Read Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address, a stunningly moving model of public theology written by a man whose true beliefs elude historians still today. No, actually read the speech and marvel at this man’s magnanimity after four years of shockingly bloody killing. He captured in this speech a mature political philosophy that shamed the many warmongers masquerading as pastors in both the North and South. Even today, the church cries out to God for him to raise up more pastors and theologians who can help the evangelical public understand that for all this nation’s blessings, Jesus Christ didn’t robe himself in an American flag.
My concern stems from experience working on Capitol Hill in partisan roles. When I struggled several years ago to distinguish between my theological beliefs and convictions on such matters as tax policy and federal bureaucracy, I needed an oasis where I could escape the withering heat of political campaigning. I found it in the community of Capitol Hill Baptist Church. Only here did I associate with anyone from the other party. Only here did I hear a message that would endure forever, long after everyone had forgotten any press releases or speeches I wrote. And when I returned on September 16 for a 9Marks Weekender hosted by the church, I found here again a refuge from the arguments that the world invests with undue importance. Indeed, I heard from senior pastor Mark Dever the best sermon I know on Christianity and government. Thabiti Anyabwile, who formerly worked with Dever, described the sermon as “a biblical theology of Christians and the state, at once full of unction, intellectually challenging, and affecting the heart. I’ve heard a lot of Mark’s preaching, but I don’t know that I’ve ever heard him better.”
While Dever may serve a church on Capitol Hill, he does not commonly address issues of Christianity and government so directly. But as an expository preacher working his way through the Gospel of Mark, Dever obligated himself to address Jesus’ teaching in Mark 12:13-17. In these days of overheated rhetoric and protest rallies, I pray that evangelicals will set aside 70 minutes to listen to Dever’s sermon. Much of the wisdom expressed here echoes the forthcoming book City of Man: Religion and Politics in a New Era, written by Michael Gerson and Peter Wehner, with a foreword by Tim Keller. We need to hear from the best evangelical thinkers about a faithful, biblical approach to politics. Perhaps I can help the cause by summarizing four pages of notes I scribbled from Dever’s sermon….
I’ll let you jump over to the TGC blog to read the rest. I might be looking to pick up that new book he recommended from Moody Publishers.
The Second Inaugural address is a great example of hypocrisy. In it Lincoln sanctifies and justifies his decision to invade the South, which originally, by his own words, repeatedly (he campaigned on a platform of supporting a constitutional amendment to legalize slavery!) and in the first inaugural, that the war was not about slavery but to preserve the Union by force. Now to answer the political fallout from so much death and destruction, he blames God for the war and sanctifies his prosecution of the war by attacking civilians etc. by claiming it was God’s will all along and the blood shed by his armies’ hand was atoning blood for the sins of slaveholders. A more self serving, self-righteous, blasphemous document has never been written.
I’ll have to re-read it again. Lincoln was always presented to me as the paragon of Christian virture, but I have since learned otherwise. Still, the main point of this post is not about Lincoln. Thanks for the thoughts…
Lincoln is the central myth of the government version of american history, sort that out and the rest gets a lot clearer.
Doug,
Do you have a good book to recommend that helps with the sorting out of Lincoln and the Christian myths surrounding him?
Thanks,
Bob
I don’t give much credibility to history revisionists or conspiracists.
I understand your take, Andrew. I just have encountered the Christian variety of dressing up history. It happens from all sides, I think the truth is Lincoln was not an easy person to figure out and he may have used religious speech to score points as politicians do today. But I haven’t studied it out all that much, and I’ve heard that he did have a change of heart late in his political career and truly did become a genuine believer.