I’ve been involved in an online discussion recently on the topic of unity and separation. And I’m finding once again, that for many fundamentalists (surprise), even convincing them that unity with other believers outside a local church is not strictly optional is proving a hard sell.
I won’t bore you with the entire discussion (although some may find it helpful). I will however, take the occasion to share some thoughts on how Ephesians 3 and 4 make a strong case for the idea that unity with other believers is urged upon us in light of our mutual membership in the universal church, which is Christ’s body.
…I believe that in the world we find ourselves in, with its thousands of churches with no real interconnectedness and cooperation between most of them, intentional unity becomes somewhat odd and so a default isolationism sets in. The American situation of freedom from persecution, and good ol’ American individualism also prejudice us toward a self-existant, sufficient idea of our individual local church. Add the history of sectarian fights and all that fundamentalism has endured from all quarters, and I guess it’s little wonder that we have to defend the very idea of the “essential fact of unity” bearing with it a responsibility to act out that unity in visible ways.
Now tallying up the teaching on unity is a bit of a tall order, but just focusing on Ephesians 3 and 4 should suffice for my purposes. Given the setting I’ll just try to draw a brief sketch and not get too detailed.
Eph. 3:1-13 The inclusion of the Gentiles into the “one body” of the Church, (alongside Jews equally), is the mysterious “eternal purpose” of God. And through this new reality in the universal church, heavenly beings can see the manifold wisdom of God.
Eph. 3:14-21 Paul prays for the Ephesian believers individually to experience more fully and to know more deeply the love of Christ, together in a shared experience with all the saints. And he prays for Christ to receive glory in the universal church throughout all generations.
Eph. 4:1-3 On the basis of this cosmic purpose of the global and universal church, Paul exhorts the Ephesians to walk worthy of their calling (shared with all saints), and to bear with one another patiently aiming to maintain this unity of the Spirit (that God is working throughout the universal church as described previously) in a bond of peace. A bond between their brothers in their own city, and a bond which extends beyond even (by implication in the cosmic nature of Ephesians as the wider context).
Eph. 4:4-6 As a further ground for this activity of living together in light of the unity of the Spirit, Paul lists how unified the Ephesians are with all the saints, they share one Lord, faith, baptism and one Father God. God being over all and through all and in them all, as well as in all believers.
Eph. 4:7-10 As a practical reality working out from this existential unity, grace was given to Paul and the Ephesians, indeed to all of us, according to the measure of Christ’s gift that he gave to man in general. And this gift is tied into cosmic realities again as Jesus is ascended above all heavens, and filling up all things through this gift.
Eph. 4:11-16 The gift includes the offices of apostles and prophets and evangelists (all universal church offices, I would think), as well as pastor-teachers, and these men God has given the church (and by the way that means historical theology is important as the teachers of yester-year remain a gift to the church) are to equip all the saints for ministry-work and for mutual up-building of the universal body of Christ (as well as it’s local manifestations). All of this with the goal of all of us attaining to “the unity of the faith”, and knowledge of the Son of God.. leading to maturity and growth and experiencing the fullness of Christ, himself. Christ being the head joins the entire body, so it may grow and build itself up in love.
I would contend that yes, the local church is included in this picture. But everything about the context roots the local church reality in a context of global unity. And just as all believers want to have the fullness of Christ and true knowledge of the Son of God, so too, they should all have unity of the faith and work toward unity with one another.
Since Christ is head of the universal church, what right have we to act as if our own church is all that matters in a given locale? Why ignore other gospel preaching churches and seek to do everything on our own without recognizing and finding ways to celebrate our unity in the faith with these other believers? The mentality is wrong, not just the practice. Yes it’s easy to do nothing, given our current culture and background. It’s easy to focus on our own church and act independently of others. Easy, but is it right?
Bob – I yearn for unity in the Body as well but I cannot see it happening on this side of eternity. Just as you and I will never agree about the doctrines of Grace, I could never set in a meeting and listen to any theology by a follower of Calvin. I have heard it, examined it and dismissed it. As harsh as that sounds I’m sure the reverse is true, you couldn’t set in a meeting and listen to someone expound upon the goodness of God and how that He sent His son to planet earth to die for every single human being that ever breathed, and that anyone’s “decision” to reject this free gift doomed them to everlasting darkness. The way I see it we are stuck with what we have until our Lord appears, and then we will know even as we are known.
True, Greg. Working to explain our differences helps somewhat I think. But there is so much we can share as far as union with Christ and the like, beyond theology lectures, that we still can have meaningful unity. In the past this happened with mercy ministries and mission boards and similar things. But I do agree that differences of perspective and philosophy/doctrine, will make cooperation more limited in some areas. That doesn’t mean we should just relax and forget about looking for any unity with others, however. And we should put our differences in perspective in light of the Gospel, too.
Fantastic breakdown of the passage! I’m curious…have you had a chance to consider the implications, role, and contribution of the Eucharist (a.k.a. Communion) in the unity of the Church(es)?
Also, I recommend the book Being as Communion, by John D. Zizioulas, for a look at unity from the Trinitarian perspective — how local and universal balance, etc. It’s heavy reading, but very good, drawing on Scripture and the Early Church Fathers extensively.
Thanks Steve, I’ll have to check it out. Put it on my Amazon wishlist or something. I’m not as familiar with Greek Orthodox Church teachings but it’d be interesting to give him a read, anyway.
Thanks again.
Bob
Hi Bob,
Have you considered the ministry of Titus on Crete as a model for enforced and binding Christian unity? Consider: based on Paul’s command he had to take all the beleivers from every town on Crete and appoint one set of elders (governing one church in each town) over them all (Titus 1:5). Wild, huh? And some of them had been in Christ a long time (Acts 2:11) allowing enough time for vastly different theology to develop.
Crete is reformation done apostolic. Its the Titus Mandate.
Ted,
Sounds like a great book title! :^) I’d be happy to hear more about your book, I’ll have to check out the website. Not entirely sure your take on this, but so far it sounds good to me.
Thanks for dropping by,
Bob