Global Warming: The Myth of Consensus

I came across a couple of articles which explore the myth of scientific “consensus” when it comes to global warming being primarily caused by man.

Dr. Klaus-Martin Schulte did some research in surveying all scientific papers published from 2004 to Feb. 2007 (the results will be published in Energy and Environment). Michael Asher of Daily Tech obtained a pre-publication copy and comments on Dr. Schulte’s findings:

Of 528 total papers on climate change, only 38 (7%) gave an explicit endorsement of the consensus. If one considers “implicit” endorsement (accepting the consensus without explicit statement), the figure rises to 45%. However, while only 32 papers (6%) reject the consensus outright, the largest category (48%) are neutral papers, refusing to either accept or reject the hypothesis. This is no “consensus.”

The figures are even more shocking when one remembers the watered-down definition of consensus here. Not only does it not require supporting that man is the “primary” cause of warming, but it doesn’t require any belief or support for “catastrophic” global warming. In fact of all papers published in this period (2004 to February 2007), only a single one makes any reference to climate change leading to catastrophic results. (emphasis original)

Just prior to coming across that article, I read the latest edition of Imprimis. It was a speech by S. Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences, University of Virginia entitled “Global Warming: Man-Made or Natural?” In his article, Singer quietly argues that man’s contribution to global warming is minimal and that such warming is part of a natural cycle and may have some positive benefits.

He also had this to say about “consensus”:

In identifying the burning of fossil fuels as the chief cause of warming today, many politicians and environmental activists simply appeal to a so-called “scientific consensus.” There are two things wrong with this. First, there is no such consensus: An increasing number of climate scientists are raising serious questions about the political rush to judgment on this issue. For example, the widely touted “consensus” of 2,500 scientists on the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is an illusion: Most of the panelists have no scientific qualifications, and many of the others object to some part of the IPCC’s report. The Associated Press reported recently that only 52 climate scientists contributed to the report’s “Summary for Policymakers.”

Likewise, only about a dozen members of the governing board voted on the “consensus statement” on climate change by the American Meteorological Society (AMS). Rank and file AMS scientists never had a say, which is why so many of them are now openly rebelling. Estimates of skepticism within the AMS regarding man-made global warming are well over 50 percent.

Personally, I believe there is much that mankind can do to destroy the environment. We are called to steward it and watch over it. Yet I can’t help but believe there is an ulterior agenda behind the global warming protests. Just look at factories today versus 60 or 70 years ago. We’ve come a long way and improved emissions immensely. No matter what concessions industry makes, there are loud demands for more. With other concerns facing our world, a maniacal devotion to one particular issue is unwise. It has the potential to negatively impact the fight against poverty and for good health in the undeveloped world.

Eternal Security: Perseverance or Preservation?

previously in this series–part 1, part 2, “The Sinner’s Prayer Problem” (part 3), part 4

This is my fifth post in a series on Man-Centered Christianity. Like post #3, this is an excersus or an aside. In the last post, I explained that the Once Saved, Always Saved (OSAS) view of eternal security has contributed to the spread of man-centered Christianity. In this post, I want to develop my view of eternal security a little further, before moving on.

There was a time when I had a list of verses in my soul-winner’s New Testament, which “proved” eternal security. Chief among them was John 10:28 (KJV) “And I give unto them eternal life, and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.

Of course I still uphold this verse–it is quite precious. Jesus preserves His own. We are preserved, yet it is through faith (1 Pet. 1:3-5). God doesn’t preserve us apart from our faith (which is a gift from Him, actually).

The question in the title of this post is a little misleading. It isn’t perseverance or preservation. It’s both. The OSAS view majors on the one over and against the other. The Biblical position, in my view, is that God preserves us, but all true believers will persevere. And further, believers must persevere.

In discussing this, let me delve into a few passages at some length. Hopefully that will help explain this teaching, as well as validate it. (I know just how foreign this can sound to sincere, Bible-loving, yet steeped-in-tradition, people!)

1 Corinthians 9:23-10:14

I do it all for the sake of the gospel, that I may share with them in its blessings. Do you not know that in a race all the runners compete, but only one receives the prize? So run that you may obtain it. Every athlete exercises self-control in all things. They do it to receive a perishable wreath, but we an imperishable. So I do not run aimlessly; I do not box as one beating the air. But I discipline my body and keep it under control, lest after preaching to others I myself should be disqualified.

I want you to know, brothers, that our fathers… all drank of the spiritual Rock that followed them, and the Rock was Christ. Nevertheless, with most of them God was not pleased, for they were overthrown in the wilderness. Now these things took place as examples for us, that we might not desire evil as they did…. We must not put Christ to the test, as some of them did and were destroyed by serpents, nor grumble, as some of them did and were destroyed by the Destroyer…. Now these things happened to them as an example, but they were written down for our instruction, on whom the end of the ages has come. Therefore let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall…. Therefore, my beloved, flee from idolatry.

If you didn’t read the above verses, please go back and read them. A clear theme should emerge. Serious sin, has eternal consequences. We know from Hebrews 3 & 4, that the people referred to as “overthrown in the wilderness”, were actually not elect, they were unsaved–full of unbelief. Paul uses their example to warn professing believers, including himself. We should all take heed lest we fall, especially if we think we stand. Notice also how specifically the OT people are said to have followed Christ, and put Christ to the test. This is not some stretch for Paul, this example fits us, who also follow Christ.

With this context, the ending verses of chapter 9 take greater focus. See how Paul is doing all things for all men, so that he “may share with them in [the gospel’s] blessings”? The blessings of the gospel are in view with the prize that we run to obtain. Again, the wreath (or crown) we are running to obtain is imperishable. The fierce concern Paul has to obtain this crown argues that it is not some optional extra, not merely “rewards”, but imperishable life–the blessing of the Gospel–itself. Notice also the word “disqualified”. Every other use of the word in the New Testament (Rom. 1:28; 2 Cor. 13:5,6,7; 2 Tim. 3:8; Tit. 1:16; & Heb. 6:8) is in the context of people apostasizing from Christianity altogether. The word was translated “reprobate” in the KJV. It carries the meaning of not passing the test. In the immediately following context, we should expect to understand that test not as one to see if we get an optional crown, but a test to see if we do not get “destroyed by the Destroyer”.

Philippians 3:7-14

But whatever gain I had, I counted as loss for the sake of Christ. Indeed, I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things and count them as rubbish, in order that I may gain Christ and be found in him, not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but that which comes through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God that depends on faith–that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death, that by any means possible I may attain the resurrection from the dead. Not that I have already obtained this or am already perfect, but I press on to make it my own, because Christ Jesus has made me his own. Brothers, I do not consider that I have made it my own. But one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.

Notice the forceful and clear language here. Paul is saying he is suffering and fighting and giving everything up in order to gain Christ. This is not to gain extra rewards, or a more intimate knowledge of him. But Paul is presently counting everything as loss (notice the Greek present tense in verses 8ff., this connotes continual action) “in order to be found in him” with the righteousness that comes from God. That sounds like salvation. Notice also his words in vs. 11: he is striving if at all possible to “attain the resurrection from the dead”. Paul does not presume that because of past successes he certainly will reach the resurrection. He holds out the possiblilty that he might not make it at all. This is why he works so earnestly.

He could have said, so I might attain extra wonderful rewards for me. But he didn’t. He is saying he is working otwards the final consummation of his salvation. And he reitirates and stresses this point. “I haven’t already obtained this”, “I’m not already perfect”, “I am pressing forth to make this my own”, “I press toward the goal of the upward call”.

1 Timothy

For a fascinating study, trace each occurrance of the word “faith” in 1 Timothy, and see what Paul’s message about faith is, in that book. Consider his primary exhortations are for Timothy to have a “sincere faith” (1:5):

This charge I entrust to you, Timothy, my child, in accordance with the prophecies previously made about you, that by them you may wage the good warfare, holding faith and a good conscience. (1:18-19a)

But as for you, O man of God, flee these things. Pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, steadfastness, gentleness. Fight the good fight of the faith. Take hold of the eternal life to which you were called…. (6:11-12a)

O Timothy, guard the deposit entrusted to you. Avoid the irreverent babble and contradictions of what is falsely called “knowledge,” for by professing it some have swerved from the faith. (6:20-21a)

Do OSAS people talk like Paul does in saying “take hold of eternal life”? “Fight the good fight of faith”! Some might, but most don’t. They view saving faith in the past tense. Other kinds of faith are needed for victory, and other optional Christian experiences, but the fight of faith, whereby we lay hold on eternal life, doesn’t make sense in that theology.

And if that doesn’t make sense consider how often Paul, in this one epistle, stresses that people can depart from the faith.

  • people swerve from “sincere faith” (1:5-6)
  • Hymenaeus and Alexander “made shipwreck of their faith” (1:19)
  • “in the latter times some will depart from the faith” (4:1)
  • those who don’t provide for their family have “denied the faith and [are] worse than [unbelievers]” (5:8)
  • certain widows’ passions might “draw them away from Christ” leading them to “[abandon] their former faith” (5:11-12)
  • The craving of the “love of money” leads some to “[wander] away from the faith and [pierce] themselves with many pangs” (6:10)
  • some follow after so-called knowledge and thus “[swerve] from the faith” (6:20)

Against this backdrop of teaching, Paul’s words in 2 Timothy carry new meaning:

I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith. (2 Tim. 4:7)

1 John 2:19

This brings us to the key to this whole issue: 1 John 2:19.

They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. But they went out, that it might become plain that they all are not of us.

This verse is explicitly teaching us how we are to view those who depart from the faith–those who had faith, but unlike Paul, did not keep it. Well-meaning Arminians point out the warning passages in Hebrews along with many of the passages I’ve discussed in the last couple posts, and conclude that such persons have lost their salvation. But 1 John 2:19 speaks differently.

John tells us those who leave were never truly “of us”. They weren’t genuinely saved. Paul told the Ephesian elders that from themselves, wolves would spring up (v. 29-30). It is not that lambs became wolves, but that the wolves had “crept in unnoticed” (Jude 4). Jesus told of those who had professed Christ, but of whom Jesus said he “never knew” them (Matt. 7:21-23). Jesus didn’t know them when they were saved, and then forget them. He didn’t drop them out of his hand (John 10:28). He had never known them.

Hebrews 4:9-16

To conclude, let’s look at Hebrews 4:9-16. The context is similar to 1 Cor. 10. The hard-hearted Israelites are in view, and the author of Hebrews has told us they did not enter into the promised rest, due to their unbelief. Now here is our text.

So then, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God, for whoever has entered God’s rest has also rested from his works as God did from his. Let us therefore strive to enter that rest so that no one may fall by the same sort of disobedience. For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword… Since then we have a great high priest who has passed through the heavens, Jesus, the Son of God, let us hold fast our confession. For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses… Let us then with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need.

Notice how “the same sort of disobedience” is potentially possible for us. So we need to strive to enter that rest. Yet such striving is really a resting from our works. This is all possible because of the Word–our Great High Priest. We can come for mercy and help. We have a throne of grace, to run to.

The race set before us, was already run by Jesus. We keep our eyes on him (Heb. 12:1-2). Perseverance means we need to keep going, keep trusting, keep depending on our Savior. We never give up, we don’t presume that we’ve arrived. We keep our nose in the Book. And when we are near the point of despair because of our sin, we run to throne of Grace and are reminded of our Glorious and Sympathetic Priest.

Perseverance is not some secret works-based salvation. It is allowing God to work in us that which is well pleasing in His sight (Phil. 2:12-13). May Christ be our focus and our stay. May God help us all to press on and grow to love Jesus more.

For further helpful links on this subject, I refer you to the previous post.AddThis Social Bookmark Button

My New Tumblelog

Just a quick post to introduce my new Huckabee blog: Go Huckabee!

I wanted to have a feed of just posts about Huckabee, rather than having them interpsersed throughout my blog finds. So Go Huckabee!, let’s me easily create such a feed (see it on my sidebar, now), while at the same time setting up a separate blog to help promote Mike Huckabe for president.

I just heard about Tumblelogs this week, and they are a great idea. Particularly for those who aren’t sure they want to commit to a full fledged blog, a tumblelog presents an excellent second option. They are designed to basically just be a steady stream of shared links, pictures, videos, quotes, etc. with little to no editorial comment by the blogger. Check out my new tumblelog, and read up on them at Wikipedia. This post on tumblr.com‘s blog is great on explaining the whole conecpt, as well.

The posting bookmarklet is so absolutely simple and easy. In a few seconds you can create a post for your tumbleblog. So now there’s no excuse to not be blogging! Larry Lawton, I’m talking to you!! 🙂

The Place of Theology in Ministerial Education

Excellent thoughts on the vital role of theology in ministry preparation, from Dr. Kevin Bauder (Central Baptist Seminary, Minneapolis, MN).

First, the problems that Christian churches and Christian people are facing today are fundamentally theological. The answers cannot be found in social sciences, philosophies, or methodologies. The problems will continue to grow until we address the false theologies””the wrong ways of thinking about God and His world””that lie at their root.

Second, if the foregoing is true, then the best preparation for ministry is theological preparation. Seminaries in particular must be careful to prepare Christian leaders who have the tools to evaluate bad theologies and to correct the bad ways of living that arise from bad ways of perceiving God. Schools that overload the curriculum with “methods” courses and that fail to prepare their graduates to think through new issues are dooming the next generation to shallow leadership.

Third, within the seminaries, even the most academic subjects must be taught with an eye to real-world ministry. Ideally, every professor of Greek, Hebrew, hermeneutics, history, or theology will bring substantial pastoral or missionary experience to his task. He will be able to show his students how their studies will matter when they reach their first full-time ministry. In other words, pastoral theology should not be something that is added on. It ought to be taught in every course in the curriculum.

Let me be clear. The best preparation for ministry is rigorously theological. Greek, Hebrew, hermeneutics, and theology are right at the heart of how a Christian leader does his work. I say this, not as an ivory-tower intellectual, but as somebody who’s got his nose bloody in the real world of pastoring and church planting. There is no substitute for the training that you get in a good theological seminary.

These thoughts apply across the board, from strict fundamentalists to the evangelical left. All can tend toward an emphasis on methodology to a diminishing of theology. Be sure to read the entire post!

Facebook For Bloggers

Bob Hayton's Facebook profileI’ve taken the plunge! I’ve joined Facebook.

If you are a Facebook user already, you can add me as a friend by clicking on my mug shot to the left. If you are unfamiliar with Facebook, let me try to convince you to join!

Facebook

Facebook is like instant messaging (IM), email, photo/video sharing, and blogging software all rolled into one application. You can have as much content or as little as you want. And best of all, it is extremely safe. You have the option to allow or disallow people to become your friends. And you can share all, some, or none of your information with various friends.

Facebook is also designed for people who already have friends. Sure you can meet new friends through Facebook, but it works best if you already have networks/community and friendships to begin with. For those you know, it makes it easier and more fun to stay in touch. And you can get in touch with old friends (I have already spoken to people I hadn’t seen/written to in over 10 years.)

Facebook is totally unique. Rather than multiple pages or posts, it is one simple home page–your profile. And you can add boxes, which have content to your heart’s content. You can easily edit the layout and remove anything you don’t want. And it is very user-intuitive (i.e. its easy to learn).

Facebook is also growing by leaps and bounds. It is up to over 100,000 new users a day! Yet the policies of Facebook are very careful to disallow any false identities. They don’t let you post pictures or videos you have not created, and are very protective of privacy. So for most of these users, Facebook is a legitimate safe way to connect with real live people they know.

For more insight into the idea that is Facebook, you may be interested in reading the company founders first interview with Time magazine.

Facebook For Bloggers

I’m sure a lot of you might care less about Facebook. Then again, if you are blogging and reading my blog, you are already internet savvy and so you might be interested.

But for you fellow bloggers, there is no reason to avoid Facebook. WordPress.com has a very nice application that brings your latest posts right into Facebook. Each time you create a new post, Facebook also posts a note about it with a link. I’ve already seen some friends view my blog which had not previously, just because I set up Facebook.

For other blogging platforms, there are a variety of blog applications you can add to Facebook. I use Flog, to input my mission blog posts. And through Facebook directly I import all my photo blog posts as notes.

Once you set it up, Facebook can work on auto-pilot, promoting your blog. And periodically you can search for people you know, to see if they’ve joined Facebook. Then again, they might be searching for you too!

And if you focus on Facebook a bit more closely, you can join causes and network with others around common interests. I’m promoting Mike Huckabee through Facebook. And I’ve joined other groups. Already I’ve had someone become a friend through one of my groups, and that might lead them to my blog.

Now granted, Facebook could steal more time away from family and other concerns. Josh Harris has an excellent post on prioritizing family time in relation to Facebook. But it doesn’t have to. I view it as basically an additional email program, with a few extras I can tinker with now and again. Interestingly, Josh also encourages those who are single to get busy and use Facebook as a tool to find a potential mate!

So now you can head on over and sign up, if only to check out my profile. You can always abandon ship if you think its not for you!

Note: the picture above is from the online version of “The Future of Facebook” by Time (Paul Sakuma / AP).

On a completely unrelated note, I’m still looking for a few more guys to join a Fantasy Football league. We probably have another week or two before we cannot do this, without more people.