Bob Spots More

 

I have a few more good reads for you. It seems that everytime I do a Bobspotted Blogroll post, that I forget something or else I find a great new read hours after I post. I know you all are capable of browsing blogs on your own, but I like to collect things here for the benefit of any who haven’t read these jewels. And these are all so good I just had to share….

 

  • Jesus’ Appearance to Jacob at Peniel — a phenomenal post elaborating on the implications of viewing the one Jacob fought with at Peniel as Jesus. I don’t keep up on Nathan Pitchford’s articles (he writes here and at  Monergism.Com‘s blog Reformation Theology)  like I want to; so while I was catching up, I came across this great article. It discusses the typology surrounding Jacob’s life. If you have ever had a hard time appreciating all the various plots in Jacob’s life, this post will give them a great significance. Once again the redemptive historical hermeneutical approach succeeds in giving us great food for our souls!
  • Type A, B, or C? [intro] & [part 2] — Joel Tetreau (who contributes to NeoFundamentalist) is posting a series on his taxonomy of Fundamentalism over at Sharper Iron. He groups fundamentalists into essentially three categories: A, B, or C. I think his approach is helpful and will contribute toward a greater understanding of our differences and similarities. Hopefully this won’t divide fundamentalism more deeply, but rather serve to facilitate more unity! This is Joel’s goal too, I believe.
  • John Piper on Rom. 16:17 — This is worth the read, or better yet listen to the sermon here. Piper discusses the “unity boys” and the “purity boys” and calls for a balanced approach which avoids the perils of hyper fundamentalism on one hand and loosey-goosey evangelicalism on the other. And he gives a great exegesis of this important verse.
  • Douglas Wilson responds to the  popular new book  Letter to  a Christian Nation — Doug writes starts his own series of letters responding to Sam Harris with this post (HT: Justin Taylor). Douglas Wilson  is always worth reading.

Bobspotted Blogroll: November 11, 2006


Must Read Devotional

  • Nathan Pitchford recently posted “Confessions and Pleas”, a puritan-like prayer that will bless and encourage (as well as challenge) your soul.

On Psalter-Only Worship

  • Nathan has also given us a great post on “The Regulative Principle and Psalter-Only Worship”. It is a short read, yet it utterly devastates that position (in a loving way, mind you). I thought some may be interested in this, as music has been much on the mind around here lately!

On Discernment

Toward a Taxonomy of Fundamentalism

  • Joel Tretreau also of Neo Fundamentalist, has posted the introduction to what will surely prove to be a thought provoking series of posts entitled “Three Lines in the Sand”. In this article, Joel seeks to provide a taxonomy of fundamentalism. He labels some Type A, others Type B, and the conservative evangelical crowd (like Piper and MacArthur) get a Type C rating.
  • It is extremely difficult to define fundamentalism, as my own attempt at a taxonomy proves! But I think Joel’s approach will prove to more than descriptive. It will be very helpful and hopefully serve to enable a greater unity among all of us who prize the fundamentals of the faith so dearly.

On 4 Point Calvinism

  • If you are interested in the difference between 4 point and 5 point Calvinism, check out this post by Reformation Theology blog. The discussion can be a bit deep at times, but you may find it helpful in thinking through that whole issue.

Recommended Reads

The last couple weeks have left me a bit disconnected from the blog world. I have yet to catch up on my reading (I probably won’t read everything I could or would like to). This week, too, I have been a little under the weather.  

 

Well, as I get caught up and refocused on my blog, I thought I’d pass along some good reading that I have found recently. This post is not exhaustive, just a few recommended reads.  

 

Bobspotted Blogroll: September 24, 2006


Must Read from John Piper

  • If your head is not stuck in the sand, you probably have heard about the latest Muslim hissy fit. This time it is over statements from the pope taken out of context, rather than Danish cartoons. For us Christians, who routinely endure harsh criticisms from both West and East, it is easy to get bent out of shape over Muslims’ insistence to make mountains out of molehills. And it is probably good to be somewhat upset over the inconsistency of Muslims. When someone infuriates us Christians, we might strike back with a torrent of words. But when the Muslims are infuriated, public calls for anger, violent demonstrations and attacks are the result.
  • Well in the midst of all of this, John Piper provides some very encouraging and insightful comments. He describes just how Christians should respond to the controversy surrounding Muslim outrage over the pope’s comments.
  • Late Addition: Clickhere to read the pope’s speech. It is very good, actually. His main point is that Western society is wrong to  exclude questions of faith  from the category of reason. And he further argues that this feature of the West in effect makes religion and faith a kind of sub-culture. So it is no wonder, he concludes, that the West cannot effectively interact with Eastern and other religious-based cultures. (HT: John Chitty for the link)

On the Dearth of Cross-Centered Worship

  • Bob Kauflin has an excellent post concerning a contemporary tendency to  not focus on the cross in worship songs. He mentions song writers who are focusing on the cross, and gives some reasons as to why others are not. It is a very worthwhile read.

Redemptive Historical Hermeneutical Jewels

On the King James Only Issue

Radical Thoughts from World from Our Window

On Interpreting 1 Cor. 13:12  

“For we know in part, and we prophesy in part. But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.” — I Corinthians 13:9, 10. This verse was written by the apostle Paul, who only had a partial Bible (the Old Testament). The word “perfect” in the Bible means complete (see James 1:4 et al). Today we have the complete, perfect King James Bible, and as God promised, that which was in part has been done away (i.e. the original Hebrew and Greek manuscripts used in time past, which were only a part of the Bible respectively).

(And yes, he is defending the absurd view that the KJV  English is superior to the  Greek).

Some of Those Other Guys  

  • Everyone has their circle of friends and list of blogs they keep track of. As you all should be able to tell from now, I try to faithfully keep up with some ex-IFBx bloggers, and other  reforming  fundamentalists (most of these blogs are listed in this post).   I also try to keep abreast with what is going on over at  Sharper Iron,  occasionally spending some time in the forums there. I do try to  keep my ear to the ground for any great posts from Pyromaniacs, Reformation Theology, Between Two Worlds, Adrian Warnock’s blog, and a few other blogs for good measure, too.
  • Well this means, obviously, that there are a whole host of other blogs run by other guys (and gals), with whom I rarely interact with. No one can interact with all the blogs out there, unless of course you are Mathew Simsand you can read 5 blog posts a minute. (Check out his ridiculously long blogspotting posts–which always seem to exclude me :)! Just kidding here, he is a blogging pal and I do hold a place of honor in his very long blogfolio—a daily read, no less)
  • Boy, this is turning into quite the long introduction! Anyway, I wanted to make my readers aware of some of those other guys—a group of guys who are fundamentalist reformers in their own right. I think most of them are loosely connected with Northland Baptist Bible College, and some are blessed (?) to know my brother Dave.
  • To introduce you to a few of them, let me link to some good posts.  

Finally

  • I must  include a  shameless self plug for my recent post: “Lord’s Supper—Snack or Feast?” I would love for some more input from my readers as to whether they agree with my thesis that the Lord’s Supper would be better celebrated with a meal than with cracker crumbs and thimble-sized cups of juice.

Late Addition

Bobspotted Blogroll: September 16, 2006

Interesting  New Blog

  • I discovered an interesting new blog recently by someone who has come to embrace Calvinism and leave some of the more extreme elements of fundamentalism. Many of his articles are very thought provoking and I am sure you all would be interested in perusing some of them. The blog is aptly titled The Reforming Baptist, and as for who that fellow is, his name is William Dudding.
  • I like to read new blogs chronologically and so I was pleasantly surprised that his second post (from back in August) dealt with the topic my most recent post addresses. William’s post is entitled “Legislated Holiness” and it is a must read. He says a lot with a short post, and he drives his point home: legislation cannot truly produce holiness. (He follows it up later with a good post on legalism.)
  • This post’s title should grab your attention: “Do You Listen to Preaching or Squawking?” The post is even better than the title, it is the best critique of IFBx preaching that I have seen since Regler Joe gave us the universal outline for an IFBx Conference Sermon.
  • The last post of note to mention from William’s blog touches a more somber note. His post entitled “Mis-Representing God” concerns the all too common, tragic results of fundamentalist extremism: kids who grow up in that movement only to walk away from Christianity and faith completely. “If that is Christianity”, they reason, “I want nothing to do with it!”

On the Rise and Fall of Fundamentalism

  • Ryan DeBarr has some very interesting thoughts concerning Fundamentalism being a victim of its own success. He suggests that Fundamentalism helped spawn the conservative resurgence in the SBC as well as the birth of the PCA. And these two movements now are a major factor in fundamentalism’s decline. It is a very worthwhile read.

On Perception, Reality, and a Culture of Fear

  • Bob Bixby has a very thought provoking post on fundamentalism’s tendency to focus too much on perception rather than reality. He is talking mainly about something promoted by leadership whereby they create a culture of fear where everyone is afraid of  how they might be perceived if they are caught doing  various things. It is kind of hard to  talk about the post, you really need to read it. But I will post a few excerpts to whet your appetite.  (HT: Ben Wright)

One pastor chastised a member in his church for allowing a prohibited music at that person’s private function. The music wasn’t bad. It just gave someone the perception of bad music. She had “lost her testimony,” she was told. Several large ministries that I know of, “flagship ministries,” now permit the staff women to wear pants in public as long as no one sees them. [Yeah, yeah, I said that right.] Another major ministry allows its staff members to go to theaters as long as it is outside of a fifty mile radius of the ministry. Hmmm. I wonder what they can do if they go one hundred miles away? Two hundred miles? Tantalizing stuff!

Who are they afraid of? Is there anyone in the real world that will be permanently ill-affected by the sight of a Christian woman in slacks? Is there any normal person that will have his faith ransacked by the mere sight of a staff member going into a cinema. Is there any regular Joe that will fall from the faith by the beat of music? Come on! Who are they really afraid of? The reality is that they are pandering to legalistic, judgmental, Christians who have been bred in a church culture that follows leaders who say “perception is reality” and canonized their misperceptions. And how can you “lose your testimony” to judgmental Christians who are bent on drawing their conclusions from their perceptions when their misperceptions carry within them the power to constrain sincere people? Or why should you care?

Leaders actually try to control people based upon their perception even if they misperceive. The problem with believing that perception is reality is that it forces your hand to treat a harmless perception like a grotesque reality. It invites harsh over-reactions. Everybody knows that the male staff member should not have taken the female staff member back to her home without a third party, but you don’t have to can the guy and pin the scarlet letter on him as if he had committed adultery. The perception is dubious, granted, but the reality is probably that the staff members didn’t even think about the negative suggestions their ride home might provoke. Give “˜em a break. Merely consciously admitting the obvious that you don’t know reality for sure will temper how you respond to the perception. But, unfortunately, since perception is reality with these leaders they cultivate a culture of fear and they train their followers to control their leadership by the same means. Now, many leaders today are hamstrung by the cultures they cultivated.

Christians need an environment where they know that they will get the benefit of the doubt. They long to be free from the “misperceptions” and accepted on the basis of, and even in spite of, the reality. It is only in an environment like that where they will flourish….[Be sure to read the entire article.]

On Finney and Fame

  • Okay, fame is misleading, but it does go nicely with Finney.    Four links to my post on Finney and the altar call is hardly fame, although one of the links was from Phil Johnson in a Pyromaniacs’ Blogspotting post. (Thanks to David Kjos, Micah Fries, and “seeker” for the other links!)
  • Confession time: If you  have yet to  put two and two together,  you may  be interested  to learn that  Phil’s use of the term “blogspot” is where I came up with the idea for “bobspotted”, as in “Bobspotted Blogrolls” and “Bobspotted Blogs”.
  • I cannot leave this point without mentioning that Micah Fries‘ link is in the context of his own good article on the altar call and Charles Finney. He furnishes us with an interesting quote by Finney on his own use of that method. I encourage you guys to go check out his article, if you were interested in mine.

On A Free Book Offer

  • Can’t  pass up letting you all know about a freebie! The book is entitled The Graham Formula: Why Most Decisions for Christ are Ineffective and it is by Patrick MacIntyre. Here is the deal, the book is free for pastors from now through September 29th. The rest of us can buy it for $7.99 (+ $3.99 S/H even if you qualify for a free book), or download it for $2.99, like I did.
  • The book looks really good. It makes several of the same criticisms I pointed out in my recent post on Finney and the Altar Call. However, the book is actually dedicated to Finney, with the  belief that the altar call itself is not bad, rather  it is Billy Sunday’s innovations which are at fault. The book also praises Billy Graham in ways I had not heard before. But I think that idiosyncracies aside, the book does a good job in making an important point. The methodologies in vogue today are producing hundreds of false conversions. The book is filled with statistics and quotes from others who make his same point. And for that it seems even more valuable. It is worth $2.99 for sure, and if you can get it for free, go for it! Here is the link for the free deal, and here again is the link for ordering the book.