Once Saved, Always Saved?!?!

Eternal Security, the get-out-of-jail-free card evangelicals carry enabling them to party and live it up with the 100% assurance that they will not face the wrath of God!NOTE: For an updated copy of this post, see the “Mining the Archives” post here.

Today’s popular evangelical maxim “once saved, always saved” while based in the Biblical truth of justification by faith alone has morphed into a virtual get-out-of-jail-free card for far too many. The church’s duty to make disciples of all nations has been downgraded to an optional extra. The gospel call to repent and believe has become a plea for sinners to assent to the facts of the gospel, pray a prayer, and join the cool Christian club called churchianity. Gone are the stern warnings to “watch and pray” and “endure to the end”. Gone are the bold exhortations to “make your calling and election sure” and “be diligent to be found in [Christ] without spot or blemish”. In their place are the warm assurances “since you confessed you are saved” and “since eternal life is a free gift, God cannot take it back”, and the friendly reminders “everybody makes mistakes” and “don’t sweat: remember, we’re under grace!” The old doctrine that saints must diligently make a personal effort to persevere in faith has been overshadowed by the new doctrine that saints can live just like anyone else in the world and as long as they once assented to gospel truths they are most certainly bound for heaven.

I wish I was merely exaggerating the situation. But when a nationally well known evangelical leader like Charles Stanley seriously believes and teaches that people who actually stop believing in Christ and walk out on God are still eternally secure, I can hardly be accused of overstating my case. In the article linked to above he claims, “The Bible clearly teaches that God’s love for His people is of such magnitude that even those who walk away from the faith have not the slightest chance of slipping from His hand.” He goes on to only deal with Eph. 2:4-9 and 1 Cor. 1:21, while adding in a good portion of reasoning and illustrations. In his book Eternal Security: Can You Be Sure? he makes the startling claim that salvation can be compared to receiving a tattoo. Even if moments later, you regret receiving the tattoo, it cannot change the fact that you have it! (pg. 80)

The Grace Evangelical Society exists to perpetuate such ideas. In other specters of evangelicalism, easy believism is represented by a 1-2-3-repeat-after-me approach to evangelism. A very large segment of independent fundamental Baptists (represented by literally thousands of churches and tens [if not hundreds] of thousands of members) emphasizes this approach to such excess that staggeringly huge numbers of salvations and baptisms are reported each year–which if really true, would make the Great Awakening look like a picnic. People are converted in five minutes or less–even through a rolled-down window during the duration of a stop light! One church has boasted of a milliion souls saved in the past 25 years, and yet less than 500 attend on any given Sunday.

Today no view seems criticized as much as Lordship Salvation or the Calvinistic doctrine of the Perseverance of the Saints. These views are very similar, if not synonomous and both share a strong critique. Charges of “works-salvation” or “perfectionism” are thrown mercilessly at these misunderstood views.

So how did we come to such a time and situation as this? It seems that in a mix of zeal and evangelistic fervor, popular Christianity began to move away from its confessional roots in the late 1800s. American individualism probably worsened the situation, as Sola Scriptura became the license for anyone and everyone to disregard centuries of theological formulations and church teaching and come up with a myriad of homespun theories. The lasting impact of Charles G. Finney, who rejected substitutionary atonement among other orthodox doctrines, also contributed to what became popular American revivalism. Today, people have hardly heard of many of the great Reformation confessions like the Westminster Confession or the Synod of Dort, and yet they are quick to find a proof text for a host of contradictory Biblical teachings.

Yet a misunderstanding of perseverance is not limited to Arminians and non-Calvinists today, either. Doug Wilson says it well in a recent post on Heb. 3:7-19:

Apostasy is a real sin, committed by real people. This is something that Arminians get, and that most Calvinists do not get. None of the elect can every [sic] be taken out of God’s electing and sovereign decree. This is something that Calvinists get, and that Arminians do not get. Arminians can read Romans 8 through 11 and not see the absolute sovereignty of God, which is something that never ceases to astonish me. But lest we Calvinists get on a high horse, Arminians can read though Hebrews and can see real apostasy there. There are few things more exegetically embarrassing than to hear a Calvinist talk about how the warnings are hypothetical, like “keep off the grass” signs in the middle of the Sahara. There are many things that can be said to this, but the most compelling of them is that the warnings invariably deny that they are anything like hypothetical….The sin warned against here is that of evil unbelief, pure and simple. Not only is it unbelief, it is unbelief resulting in apostasy — departure from the living God, falling away from the living God. The sin is spoken of in the sternest possible way — rebellion, hardened hearts, evil heart of unbelief, and a departure from God…..This book [Hebrews] is about the sin of apostasy. Can a Christian fall away? Yes. Can someone who is truly regenerate, elect of God, an eternal Christian, fall away? No, clearly not.

Before I go on to defend the Biblical (I believe) doctrine of perseverance, let me provide here a brief excerpt from John Piper’s book The Purifying Power of Living by Faith in Future Grace


A few years ago I spoke to a high school student body on how to fight lust. One of my points was called, “Ponder the eternal danger of lust.” I quoted the words of Jesus–that it’s better to go to heaven with one eye than to hell with two–and said to the students that their eternal destiny was at stake in what they did with their eyes and with the thoughts of their imagination….After my message…one of the students…asked, “Are you saying then that a person can lose his salvation?”…This is exactly the same response I got a few years ago when I confronted a man about the adultery he was living in….I pled with him to return to his wife. Then I said, “You know, Jesus says that if you don’t fight this sin with the kind of seriousness that is willing to gouge out your own eye, you will go to hell”….As a professing Christian he looked at me in utter disbelief, as though he had never heard anything like this in his life, and said, “You mean you think a person can lose his salvation?”…So I have learned again and again from firsthand experience that there are many professing Christians who have a view of salvation that disconnects it from real life, and that nullifies the threats of the Bible, and puts the sinning person who claims to be a Christian beyond the reach of biblical warnings. I believe this view of the Christian life is comforting thousands who are on the broad way that leads to destruction (Matthew 7:13)….The main concern of this book is to show that the battle against sin is a battle against unbelief. Or: the fight for purity is a fight for faith in future grace. The great error that I am trying to explode is the error that says, “Faith in God is one thing and the fight for holiness is another thing….The battle for obedience is optional because only faith is necessary for final salvation.” (pg. 330-331 and 333)

Belief in perseverance does not negate the great truth that faith alone justifies and secures our eternal salvation. Rather it affirms with Martin Luther, “We are saved by faith alone, but not a faith that is alone.” Our works prove the sincerity of our faith, and are in this sense necessary. This is why so many passages teach that God will actually judge all mankind by their works. Without exception, Rom. 2:6-11 states: “He will render to each one according to his works: to those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immorality, he will give eternal life; but for those who are self-seeking and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, there will be wrath and fury. There will be tribulation and distress for every human being who does evil, the Jew first and also the Greek, but glory and honor and peace for everyone who does good, the Jew first and also the Greek. For God shows no partiality.” The reason this does not teach works salvation is that when we come to God in faith (as a result of his work of regeneration in our hearts–John 1:13 and 1 Jn. 5:1, and his gifts of faith–Acts 3:16, 15:9, 18:27, 1 Pet. 1:21, Phil. 1:29, Eph. 1:19-20, 2 Pet. 1:1 and repentance–Acts 5:31, 11:18, 2 Tim. 2:25) he begins a good work in us (Phil. 1:6) and will be the One to complete it. He will produce good works in us as a testimony of the genuineness of our faith–Eph. 2:10, Phil. 2:13, 1 Cor. 15:10, 1 Thess. 5:23-24, Jude 24, Tit. 2:14.

In other words, true regeneration produces true fruit. This is Jesus’ teaching in Matt. 7:18-19 “A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.” In the parable of the sower, the only soil which produced fruit was the good soil. Even thought the rocky soil produced plants which looked healthier than the fruitful plants, they bore no fruit and withered away. Jesus said this represents those “who receive [the word] with joy…but…have no root: they believe for a while, and in time of testing fall away.” The clear teaching of the parable is that transient faith does not save. Only the faith that bears fruit saves.

In understanding perseverance, it is important to recognize the difference between justification and glorification. Justification is the legal pronouncement of “not guilty” which happens immediately upon our faith and is based on Christ’s substitutionary atonement. This pronouncement is a voice from heaven, so to speak, concerning our hearts. The testimony from earth (our lifestyle) does not unfalteringly reflect this. Sanctification is a slow and gradual process of the out-working of our faith and the living out of our justification. Glorification is the point when we are gloriously tranformed into Christ’s image immediately after our death. At this point salvation is final. Up until then, since we cannot enter heaven’s throneroom and hear the irreversible verdict of “not guilty” applied to us, we must trust in sanctification to prove the genuineness of our faith. The term “salvation” is most often used in Scripture to refer to our glorification and only sparingly used to refer to justification. So when we see the English words “whoever believes will be saved” it usually is teaching that whoever believes will one day ultimately be saved/glorified. The Greek tense used for “believe” most often (99% or more of the time) in such statements is the present tense which directly conveys a continual action. Literally, it is often stated, “the believing one will be saved”. If we walk away from faith and cease believing we prove to not be a “believing one”.

Perseverance is required of believers. It is our duty. But the flip side of this is the teaching that God will preserve His elect (John 10:26-30, 1 Pet. 1:5, etc.). So all of the elect–all the truly regenerate among professing believers–will persevere and it will be by God’s grace. Most reading this post already understand that God will preserve the elect, so I will not labor to prove that assertion. But what follows will conclude this post by providing a defense of my assertion that the Bible requires us (professing believers) to persevere.

The Bible speaks of our need to “examine” ourselves (2 Cor. 13:5) and to diligently “make our calling and election sure” (2 Pet. 1:10). We cannot assume that since we believed in the past or made some profession of faith, we are absolutely and inviolably secure eternally. We must make room for the Scriptural potential that our faith could be insincere or not genuine. Luke 8:13 again, speaks of those who “believe for a while, and in time of testing fall away”. Even Paul leaves it open that he might even still yet become a “castaway” (same Greek word for apostate) in 1 Cor. 9:27.

Heb. 3:12-14 (along with other warning passages in Hebrews) is emphatically clear that we might ultimately fall away, and so thus we need to daily exhort one another to continue in belief. Paul calls this the “good fight of faith” in 1 Tim. 6:12 and exhorts Timothy to “take hold of the eternal life” (6:12) and to “hold faith” (1:19), because some had already “made shipwreck of their faith” (1:20), and some have “abandoned their former faith” (5:12), and others have “swerved from the faith” (6:21). This is why he exhorts Timothy to “Keep a close watch on yourself and on the teaching. Persist in this, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers.” (4:16) This is why so often Paul and other Scriptural authors do not boldly assure their readers of their personal sharing in Christ, rather they hold out before them their duty to persevere. See all the conditional statements in the following verses: Col. 1:23–“if indeed you continue in the faith, stable and steadfast,…”; 1 Cor. 15:2–“by which [the gospel] you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you–unless you believed in vain”; Heb. 3:6–“and we are his house if indeed we hold fast our confidence and our boasting in our hope”; Heb. 3:14–“we share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original confidence firm to the end”; John 8:31–“if you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples”; Mark 13:13–“the one who endures to the end will be saved”; 2 Tim. 2:12–“if we endure, we will also reign with him”; Rom. 8:13–“if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live”; Gal. 6:9–“in due season we will reap [eternal life (see 6:8)], if we do not give up”; Heb. 12:14–“holiness without which no one will see the Lord”; James 2:26 (with 14)–“faith apart from works is dead” and “can that faith save him?”

Scripture never gives us assurance of salvation based on our profession of faith (in a past time and place), rather it declares the objective reality of Christ’s work and the subjective reality of the Spirit’s work in our lives as the grounds for assurance. (And the stress in 1 John is on our subjective experience of characteristic obedience.) 1 John 2:3 states ” And by this we know that we have come to know him, if we keep his commandments.” 1 John 2:19 also gives us the key to understanding this truth. It helps us to interpret what happened when we see someone who seemed to have genuine faith fall away. It declares, “They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. But they weent out, that it might become plain that they all are not of us.” In other words, we should not conclude like some Arminians that all professing believers who fall away have in fact lost their salvation. Rather we should conclude that they were only professing but not possessing faith. Paul teaches this same truth when he declares belief could be in vain (1 Cor. 15:2) or could be only temporary (see 1 Thess. 3:5). Jesus also clearly taught both the reality of professors being proven to not possess faith in the scary passage of Matt. 7:21-23, and the need to persevere in Luke 21:34-36 among other places.

To sum up the teaching of perseverance, let us quote 2 passages. 2 Thess. 2:13b “God chose you as the firstfruits to be saved, through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth.” Heb. 6:12b “be…imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises.” Both of these passages teach that ultimate, final salvation (inheriting the promises) come to those who both believe and persevere (are sanctified/have patience).

But should this teaching result in our condemning large segments of evangelicalism and condemning many we know? Are we to judge them as not being true possessors since we may doubt their perseverance? No! Emphatically, no! Remember, justification is a heavenly sentence. We do not know, here on earth, what that sentence is. We can judge based on their fruits, but we also must be aware of the motes and beams in our own eyes. We should judge ourselves first and others much later. We can have confidence and hope in our sovereign God that there are evidences of grace in all who profess salvation. But then again, we know Biblically that this is most likely not the case. So rather than condemn one another, we should seek to edify one another and encourage them to press on, and to continue in belief (Heb. 3:2-14 and Gal. 6:1-9).

Before I close, we must revisit that popular maxim, “once saved, always saved.” If “saved” is viewed as glorification, I do not disagree at all with that statement. Nor would I if “saved” is viewed as justification. But once again, the proof of the pudding is in the eating, and the proof of justification is in your works (James 2). So even with the truth of once justified, always justified in view, we must never assume we have been justified if we have no good works to point to as Spirit-wrought proof.

In conclusion, brothers and sisters, I say with the apostle John “Watch yourselves, so that you may not lose what we have worked for, but may win a full reward.” (2 John 1:8) And remember that although Jude warns us to “Keep yourselves in the love of God, waiting for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ that leads to eternal life” (v. 21) he also assures us “Now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you blameless before the presence of his glory with great joy…” (v. 24). So do not lose heart. Trust in God’s great promises, and fight the good fight of faith. Above all, do not presume that you have arrived and are outside the bounds of Scripture’s warnings. Rather, “be all the more diligent to make your calling and election sure, for if you practice these qualities you will never fall.” (2 Pet. 1:10)

For a more succinct treatment of this topic, I refer you to an earlier post where I reproduce an outline by my brother Dave on Heb. 3:2-14. Also, for a Biblical look at how important mutual edification of believers is, see my post on 1 Thessalonians. And for more resources concerning this topic, check out some articles and sermons by John Piper listed here on the issue of future grace, or just read his book referenced above. [The last link above was added 2/13/06.]

For further thoughts on this topic check out a more recent post here.

picture was borrowed from here.

A People Who Pursue Sanctification

The following is taken from a sermon note-sheet and bulletin insert designed to go along with a message preached by the pastor of Martin Baptist Church on 1/29/06. Posted by permission.

A People Who Pursue Sanctification

Hebrews 3:12-14 “Take care, brothers, lest there be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart, leading you to fall away from the living God. But exhort one another every day, as long as it is called “today,” that none of you may be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin. For we share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original confidence firm to the end.”

Introduction

  • Justification = God declaring us “innocent”–by faith alone in Christ.
  • Sanctification = God transforming us gradually–by faith alone in Christ.
  • Justification = the root. Sanctification = the fruit.

Observations from the Text

  • Each of us is vulnerable to hardness of heart.
  • This hardening takes place when we turn away from God in unbelief, and pursue the deceitful pleasures of sin.
  • This is a frightening thing, because if hardness of heart remains unbroken, it leads straight to Hell, proving we were never born again after all.
  • Therefore, we should be earnest about cultivating tender hearts of faith and hope in Christ–thereby proving the reality of our conversion.
  • God has ordained that this struggle be a group effort of daily Christ-centered conversations with one another.

The following questions and answers were developed from real life questions and scenarios Dave has encountered in his ministry.

What about Eternal Security?

Eternal Security is real and biblical [vs. 14; Rom. 8:30; Phil. 1:6]. But God’s Word repeatedly warns us against presumption and self-deception [Matt. 7:20-23; Luke 8:4-15; 2 Cor. 13:5; Gal. 6:7-8]. Yes, “once saved, always saved”; but salvation is life-changing [2 Cor. 5:17; Gal. 5:24]. So if your life doesn’t change, if there is little evidence of the fruit of the Holy Spirit in you–then the Bible calls upon you to diligently “make your calling and election sure” [2 Pet. 1:10].

What about Assurance of Salvation?

Assurance of salvation, according to the Bible, has less to do with a past event or decision in your life [since these things always have the potential of being fabricated by Satan–Matt. 7:21], and more to do with the present awareness and evidence of the Holy Spirit’s influence in your life [Gal. 5:22-23]. Jesus told us, absolutely, that if we love Him, we will obey Him [John 14:15]. There can be no assurance of salvation without genuine obedience to Christ [1 John 2:3-6]. There are obviously different levels of growth and obedience [Rom. 14:1; Gal. 6:1-2]–and God does ordain seasons of great struggle and little assurance, so that we would be further propelled to look to Christ and follow hard after Him [Psalm 43, 51; Rom. 8:23; Heb. 12:1-3, 12]. But at the end of the day, our assurance of salvation is rooted in visible acts of faith and love which spring from the deep hope we have in Christ [Col. 1:3-5; 1 thess. 1:4-6].

Isn’t this Works-Salvation?

No! We do not persevere in order to gain a share in Christ; rather, we make evident that we already have come to share in Christ–if we do indeed persevere in faith unto the end [vs. 14; Matt. 24:12-13; John 15:8]. We do not “work for” our salvation, but we do “work out” our salvation [Phil. 2:12]. We are told to “take hold of eternal life” and “fight” the life of faith [1 Tim. 6:12]. We do work vigorously, passionately, and reverently–but all along we attribute every good work in us to the power of the Holy Spirit and the sovereign grace of God [Gal. 2:20, 3:3, 5:22; Eph. 2:10; Phil. 2:12-13; 1 Cor. 3:6, 4:7, 15:10; Heb. 6:3].

The Goodness of God in Election

When I was catching up on reading my favorite blogs, I came across this brief and powerful quote over at Reformation Theology Blog. I have here reproduced the entire quote for my reader’s benefit. (Thanks to Pastor John Samson for bringing this to my attention with this post.)

After giving a brief survey of these doctrines of sovereign grace, I asked for questions from the class. One lady, in particular, was quite troubled. She said, ‘This is the most awful thing I’ve ever heard! You make it sound as if God is intentionally turning away men and women who would be saved, receiving only the elect.’ I answered her in this vein: ‘You misunderstand the situation. You’re visualizing that God is standing at the door of heaven, and men are thronging to get in the door, and God is saying to various ones, ‘Yes, you may come, but not you, and you, but not you, etc.’ The situation is hardly this. Rather, God stands at the door of heaven with His arms outstretched, inviting all to come. Yet all men without exception are running in the opposite direction towards hell as hard as they can go. So God, in election, graciously reaches out and stops this one, and that one, and this one over here, and that one over there, and effectually draws them to Himself by changing their hearts, making them willing to come. Election keeps no one out of heaven who would otherwise have been there, but it keeps a whole multitude of sinners out of hell who otherwise would have been there. Were it not for election, heaven would be an empty place, and hell would be bursting at the seams. That kind of response, grounded as I believe that it is in Scriptural truth, does put a different complexion on things, doesn’t it? If you perish in hell, blame yourself, as it is entirely your fault. But if you should make it to heaven, credit God, for that is entirely His work! To Him alone belong all praise and glory, for salvation is all of grace, from start to finish. – Mark Webb [emphasis added]

This quote really reveals the heart of Calvinism, and addresses the main objection raised in those who do not understand it. If only Dave Hunt had heard this quote before he wrote his book What Love is This? Perhaps he would have been more understanding as to where Calvinists are coming from. If you are not a Calvinist, I hope this quote helps you understand us a little bit better! And if you are, try using the analogy; I know I will!


∼striving for the unity of the faith for the glory of God∼ Eph. 4:3,13 “¢ Rom. 15:5-7

Cessationism and Continuationism: a Debate over Spiritual Gifts

Lately, it has been hard to avoid the cessationist / continuationist debate when perusing the Christian blogosphere. I mentioned it myself in a recent post on a somewhat different topic. But the time has come for me to open up the debate for any interested here on my blog.

Have miraculous gifts, tongues, and prophecy ceased today??

What follows is my bringing together a list of links to interesting articles on the topic. I come from a cessationist background, yet I have much sympathy for the continuationist position in principle (for some brief definitions of terms and a discussion of the debate check out Phil Johnson’s post here.) Today there are quite a few “reformed charismatics” . And they are not your typical TBN variety, either!

Before you continue on to the rest of this article, though, at least reference my recent post explaining the current blog-o-debate over this issue centering on Phil Johnson’s blogs (his now abandoned Pyromaniac, and the new teamblog Pyromaniacs).

  • At the onset let me state that I believe much of this debate centers on assumptions and implications. The cessationist assumes that with the closure of the canon, the function of these miraculous or apostolic-type gifts (throw in prophecy too) is no longer needed. They also assume that the purpose of the gifts is tied up in an apostolic authentication function which has ceased with the John the Beloved’s death. On the flip side, the continuationist assumes the gifts should continue since Scripture does not expressly teach there cessation. (Cessationists’ claims that 1 Cor. 13:8 is such an express teaching seem too simplistic and eisegetical to me.)
  • Now, to the articles…. Phil Johnson points out, in a post entitled “You’re probably a cessationist, too”, that virtually all charismatics agree that the modern use of prophecy (and even the modern exercise of the gift of miracles) is inherently different from the NT exercise of it by the apostles and others. From this he claims continuationists “have, in effect, conceded the entire concessionist argument” .
  • Adrian Warnock points out, though, that virtually all cessationists concede a good bit of the continuationist’s argument by holding to a continued experiential role of the Holy Spirit in the lives of believers.
  • Steve S has a series of articles on this subject which trace the nature of Biblical prophecy and show how the closing of the canon really does not address the question at hand.
  • Ben Wright, of Paleoevangelical, in a series of articles dealing with Fundamental Baptist Fellowship’s position on John Piper (see part 1, part 2, and part 3 of this interesting series) he makes the following interesting observations, “Is there not a difference between recognizing a specific ongoing gift [to specific individuals] of healing or miracles, and merely allowing that God might still choose to perform a miraculous healing or some other sign to validate the gospel?” And he brings the argument home when he applies this point to fundamentalist missionaries describing miraculous workings of God on the foreign field. He says, “These events seem to be similar to what Piper is talking about. The only difference I see is that Piper is advocating that we pray for these signs, but fundamentalists merely testify that they happen.” See the whole post here.
  • Steven Harris has an excellent article dealing with the eschatological function of spiritual gifts. THIS IS DEFINITELY WORTH READING!!
  • And last, but not least, John Piper has a good Scriptural treatment of spiritual gifts here. He does an especially good job dealing with the cessationist use of 2 Cor. 12:11-12 to prove the gifts are “apostolic signs” , and must therefore pass away with the apostles.

Any thoughts or suggestions? Anyone willing to contribute to the debate? For now, I am still reading and thinking prayerfully about this position, although I must be honest in stating that I can see a lot more Scriptural support on the continuationist side of the fence.

(But in closing, let me stress, this issue does not necessarily need to divide believers. The Reformation principle of Sola Scriptura is affirmed by many on both sides. The presence of explicitly false prophecies or unscriptural superstitions, or an unbiblical emphasis on the gift of tongues ”these issues are actually distinct and separate from this issue. They do not necessarily follow from continuationism. Again I point you to Nathan Pitchford’s call to unity here.)

Logic, John 6:44, and Calvinism

Reformation Theology (Monergism‘s blog) links to a very interesting textual and logical analysis of John 6:44 (Reformation Theology’s introduction of that analysis is here.) It is a little technical, but working your way through it will prove profitable. The article does not claim to infallibly prove Calvinism, but the treatment of John 6:44 will prove extremely problematic to Arminians (which is the default position of virtually all non-Calvinist evangelicals).