The REAL meaning of 1 Thess. 5:22

1 Thess. 5:22 in the KJV says “Abstain from all appearance of evil.” This is a perfectly acceptable translation. But from the Greek, we know that “appearance of evil” does not mean “any thing that appears to be evil”, but “any appearance that evil makes”. This is why the ESV has “Abstain from every form of evil.” Whatever manifestation evil takes on, this is to be abstained from.

Matt Fitzsimmons pointed out a great post dealing with vs. 22 in its larger context. This opened up to me a greater understanding of this text. Vs. 19 thru 22 are all one sentence in Greek. The issue addressed is quenching the work of the Spirit. Demeaning prophesying (preaching would be a good equivalent today) was one way the Thessalonians were doing that. Rather than despising prophyesying, Paul instructed them to welcome it, yet not indiscriminately. They were to prove each prophesying and reject those that did not pass the test, while clinging to the ones that did. Thus they were to abstain from every manifestation evil would make–even evil in the form of a public prophecy. Such a contextual treatment of vs. 22 makes it emphatically clear that it is not addressing the avoidance of conduct which might appear to be evil.

However most independent fundamental Baptists claim that this verse teaches that we should abstain from any conduct which might be looked upon as evil. It is a favorite proof text against attendance at movie theaters. (See my previous post on that topic.) Yet its applications (in this sense) are numerous. This contributes to an emphasis on external conduct and appearances within the fundamentalist movement, in my opinion (see my comment in this regard here at Matt Fitzsimmons’ blog).

Scripture has much to say about avoiding actually evil behaviors. Romans 7 deals patently with the saved person’s struggle to avoid personal, actual evil. But does any Scripture (besides the above explained 1 Thess. 5:22) demand we avoid behaviors which might only seem evil?

Well, someone might point to Scripture’s teaching that we should not purposely offend a brother or let our behavior become a stumbling block to a weak believer. However, the context of these commands seems to clearly revolve around scenarios in which we are aware that the brother or weak believer is present, and thus liable to being offended with us personally. 1 Cor. 8 and 10 deals with putting meat down for that potentially-offended brother to eat (in our presence, obviously), which he knows to be meat that was offered to idols. Rom. 14-15 again deals with meat and drink and assumes that the brother could be offended by our partaking in their presence, or our interaction with them concerning our beliefs and theirs. Clearly from Rom. 14 Paul does not say we should defer to potential misunderstanding and refuse to partake of meat or drink. He says instead we should have an obliging and loving attitude to everyone who may differ with our firm belief that our practice is God-glorifying and legal. Further, Rom. 14 also deals with days. Some still observed Jewish feasts and kept the Sabbath in a Jewish way, apparently. But this was inherently the weak position. Thus, there was no call to celebrate the sabbath in a Jewish sense, for fear of someone happening to see you passing by with a burden on your shoulder, or something. What is in view is our welcoming one another, and getting along despite differing views on such non-moral issues. (See my earlier post linking to some fantastic sermons on this passage by John Piper.) To stretch the “stumbling block” prohibition into a prohibition of any behavior which might potentially offend a believer who might potentially find out about that behavior in some indirect manner is patently wrong.

The Bible does teach that we should have a war-time mentality, which would lead us to avoid practices which might entagle us in earthly pursuits (2 Tim. 2:4), and to cast off things which might weigh us down in our heavenly race (Heb. 12:1). So I am not saying that Christians should just go out and do every permissible thing they can. And clearly there are some Biblical principles to keep in mind when planning our conduct. But the force of Scripture is behind a concern for personal morality, not a concern as to what others might think about your behaviors. We are judged by God, and must be concerned most with his opinion. And he looks both on our external conduct and on our heart.

UPDATE: The article this post refers to is no longer available online. I have written my own article with a similar title as this post. You can read that here.

The Advance of God’s Kingdom

I have posted here the power point presentations used in a close pastor friend’s recent 10 week series on “The Advance of the Kingdom”. This is really a fantastic presentation focusing on God’s plan in creation and salvation as expressed in the Biblical covenants. It is really a presentation of Covenant Theology 101. The presentation is well done, and you can get the gist of his messages just from the power point slides.

This presentation really encourages us with the glory of God’s salvation and His progressive revelation of the greatness of the gospel. I encourage you to check this out, and see for yourself how Biblical the essence of Covenant Theology really is.

Here are links to the power point files for each of the 10 parts to the presentation.

the-advance-of-the-kingdom

the-kingdom-and-the-covenant

the-covenant-of-creation

the-coveant-of-adam

the-covenant-of-noah

the-covenant-of-abraham

the-covenant-of-moses

the-covenant-of-david

the-covenant-of-christ

conclusion

(Note: these were originally used in conjunction with the Sunday morning sermon, so there is some review in the individual parts. Also, if you don’t have Microsoft PowerPoint, sometimes you at least have PowerPoint viewer, or you can download Open Office.org’s software which can read .ppt files.)

The Truth about the KJV and Copyrights

An oft-spoken proof that the KJV is superior to modern translations, is the fact that it does not have a copyright while the modern versions (more commonly termed perversions) do. Modern versions must just be all about money since they utilize a copyright!

As silly as this argument sounds it really does have an impact for the KJV-only position in the KJV-only debate. James Spurgeon deals with this argument in another great post which reveals that the KJV does indeed have a copyright! [The crown copyright of England]


∼striving for the unity of the faith for the glory of God∼ Eph. 4:3,13 “¢ Rom. 15:5-7

My first trip to the movie theater!

A scene from <em>The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe</em>--picture from <i>World</i>, 12/17/05, (Picture credits= Phil Bray--Walt Disney Pictures/AP)
I intend to make this movie, The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe, the first one I see in a movie theater. This statement might raise your eyebrows for any of 3 reasons.

First, you might be floored that I have never been to a movie theater. And if you are amazed, that lets me know that you probably are generally clueless as to the practices of independent fundamental Baptists (IFBs) by and large. You will be surprised, then, to find out that the vast majority of IFBs preach against and generally frown on going to movie theaters, as do some other non-IFB churches. Many would also view people who attend their churches and also attend movie theaters as less than spiritual believers, a kind of sub-Christian to them. “These people definitely need to get right with God, they have not yet sold out to Him,” they might think.

Second, you might be floored that I would actually go to a movie theater. If this is your reaction, you most likely are an IFB. So, let me remind you that the IFB practice of not going to a movie theater is solidly rooted in a traditional taboo, and little else. Before the proliferation of TV and movies, and before the regulation (which included rating systems) of the movie industry, there was a generally widespread reaction against movies. And certainly today no one would doubt that the movie industry produces a whole bunch of garbage–morally deficient or rather immorally proficient. But does the fact that movies can be evil require that the audiovisual medium of TV or the movie be viewed as evil too? Since tape recordings can be made of extremely vulgar language or sexually explicit themes, should I trash my tape recorder? Or does the fact that I might possibly see a woman dressed immodestly during the summer, require that I wear blinders whenever I am outdoors in a public location? Or how about the medium of the magazine? Since the best selling magazines are pornographic, must I never purchase any magazine of any type at all?

As you can see, I contend that the IFB reaction to movie theaters is an over reaction. But I further contend that it is largely a dishonest reaction. In my experience at least more than 90% of IFBs who shun movie theaters frequent video stores! They reason that one can select decent entertainment and be more in control by utilizing the VCR or now the DVD player for entertainment. But let me suggest that you can equally be selective as to which show you view at the theater! The fact that so many people (and yes IFBs number in the millions possibly as high as 10 million or more, when you lump the various groups together) conscientously refrain from movie theaters while having no problem with going in to a Blockbuster ought to be just plain stunning! “How could this be?” does anyone wonder. I contend that it represents the mindless adherence to a tradition for tradition’s sake alone. (What is more amazing I wonder, that so many would mindlessly perpetuate a tradition and hold people morally accountable to it, or that so many people would not see the glaring inconsistency between going to a video store and preaching against movie theaters!) The tradition is enforced, though. People fear getting “written off” as unspiritual or just plain rebellious by their peers and leaders, if caught going to a theater. I must say there are some IFBs which have recognized the inconsistency and their solution has been to preach against video stores. Better to forbid Bugs Bunny than to possibly allow someone to watch a PG 13 movie. Of course, no cultivation of Christian discernment and no waiting on the Holy Spirit’s individual work in believer’s lives is furthered by this stand. Far easier, and simpler to just call for mindless submission to the often almost-cultic leader.

Before leaving this point, I must turn to the common argumentation for these stands. I believe that I can turn the two most commonly raised objections to attending movie theaters on their head. First, it is said that no one will know what you watched when you are seen coming out of a theater (of course if they look at the sign which lists a fairly new release of a popular kids movie rated G and you are seen holding your children’s hands, they must be blind not to put two and two together…) and so this is a potentially damaging testimony issue. Of course no one will know which movies you rented when seen leaving the local Blockbuster either. And no one will know whether you drank beer when you come out of a Pizza Hut or Apple Bees either! And no one will know if you bought a dirty R rated movie at Wal-mart when you are seen leaving that store, too. Ad infitum. Second, it is said that one must “avoid all appearance of evil” (1 Thess. 5:22). Beside the fact that that is a misinterpretation of the verse (based on the misunderstanding of the KJV’s 400 year old english, the Greek word means “form” and the verse is not addressing what things look like on the outside, but is saying avoid every kind or every form of evil, that you could happen to be involved with), there is as much “appearance of evil” coming out of a video store as a movie theater. The fact is there are many wholesome films which can be watched by discerning believers today. Yes, discernment is often necessary, but that is how God made this earth. To make everything really nice and easy, we could just go and join the Amish, now, couldn’t we?

[UPDATE: I posted this before my clarification. I do not intend by this argumentation to despise someone who concludes that it is best to protect their family from the wrong influence of Hollywood by avoiding the theater and using videos/DVDs with discernment. In fact, I feel that we as Christians have so much more to do than waste all our time on often mediocre (at best) entertainment! I am merely trying to point out that in this issue we cannot be dogmatic and insist that if anyone goes to a theater they are sinning or are not being careful with regards to sin. It is the fact that so many IFBs (and especially IFBxs {see clarification}) preach their position on theaters as Bible, ie. absolute truth, that deeply offends me. It seems the movement prefers to tout a list of authoritative regulations rather than encourage the independent and Biblically-informed use of discernment when it comes to dealing with the complexities of our increasingly immoral culture.]

Third, you might wonder why I would make it a point that a Narnia movie would be the first one I would attend. Well, to tell you the truth, with two girls under the age of 3, it isn’t as easy to go out and attend a movie for us, as you might think. Also, since I never have gone to a theater [other than to a couple IMAX theaters, those are somehow legal :-} ] it often does not enter my mind to go. But I was challenged to go to Narnia in the theater specifically, when I read Hugh Hewitt’s article in World Magazine (Dec. 17, 2005 issue). Let me quote briefly from it.

The Christian community has a question to answer as well: Can it wholeheartedly embrace a movie project like LWW that provides exactly what’s been desired for so long, even when it comes from a studio and a corporation, like Disney, that has often disappointed in the past? Those who would welcome more and more breakthroughs like The Passion and the Narnian adventures should hope the answer to that question is a resounding yes. [Read it all…]

Some may object that going to movies like the Passion or Narnia represents an evangelical fad (see this interesting post by James Spurgeon). And to some extent they may be right. But since we live in the world, and since the world happens to be talking about such movies, cannot we interact better by seeing them too. Also, from the standpoint of culture, we Christians have long decried the moral degradation of Hollywood (IFBs often louder than any), but when we are presented with films that are both morally good, and artistically good, should we not support them. With the hopes that our support could lead to more and more wholesome entertainment choices for our families? Not to say that entertainment should have a huge place in our homes, we are called to love, serve, and risk all in sacrificing for Christ. But in our era of 8-5 workdays, entertainment is inevitable. If Christians promote wholesome entertainment, they can in one way preserve the godliness of our culture (what little remains), and in that way fulfill part of our admonition to be salt and light to this earth.


∼striving for the unity of the faith for the glory of God∼ Eph. 4:3,13 “¢ Rom. 15:5-7

An Every Word Book?

James Spurgeon posted an excellent treatment of Matt. 4:4 at his blog, The Texas Baptist Underground.

I encourage you to check it out (if you do you’ll notice a few tidbits of my own in a reply), and read all his articles this week on the topic of KJV-onlyism. I believe he is planning on posting more.

If you think that James is only out to convert fundamentalists out there, know that he has another great blog, devoted primarily to Biblical expositions with edification in mind.


∼striving for the unity of the faith for the glory of God∼ Eph. 4:3,13 “¢ Rom. 15:5-7