Understanding Lordship Salvation

Many a fundamentalist has a real hard time with the idea of “Lordship Salvation”. (With Calvinism too, but that is another post…) They have a “knee jerk” reaction against these doctrines, and yet in many ways I would view this as healthy. You look shocked, but let me explain. Fundamentalists often misunderstand these views, and with regard to “Lordship Salvation” they think of it as a “works-based salvation”. And to react strongly against works based salvation is very commendable and healthy.

But Lordship Salvation is not a works based salvation scheme. Let me say that again, Lordship Salvation is not works based salvation!

I just finished reading a series of articles which in my opinion is extremely helpful for anyone desiring to understand Lordship Salvation. And in all honesty, to understand Lordship Salvation you need to go to the horse’s mouth, so to speak. I have little patience for people who claim to seriously hold a position on a debated issue yet who have never read anything written by the other side.

Well, here is your chance. Nathan Busenitz at Pulpit Live (affiliated with John MacArthur’s church) has just finished a series of five posts critiquing Lou Martuneac’s new book In Defense of the Gospel: Biblical Answers to Lordship Salvation. Lou is a fundamentalist who has concluded that Lordship Salvation is another gospel. And Nathan explains how Lou’s conclusion is wrong by showing how Lou misunderstands Lordship Salvation. So in Nathan’s critique of Lou’s book, he provides a clear explanation of what Lordship Salvation really is.

So without further ado, let me provide the links here to Nathan’s critique of this book, and let me encourage you to check out these posts in order to have a better understanding of Lordship Salvation.

UPDATE: Here are two last links to Nathan’s final discussion of Lordship Salvation. Also, I threw in a link to the last post of Phil Johnson’s personal testimony in regards to this debate. Phil’s posts are very informative as to the history of the Lordship debate. He provides links to all the posts in that series at the bottom of the post linked to below.


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The Lordship Debate Continues

I just want to let you know about a very important discussion going on about Lordship Salvation over at Pulpit Live (a magazine/blog produced by John MacArthur’s church). The first article was posted Monday and they are posting one article a day. In the comment thread, one fast learns just how important an issue this still is. The latest post gives a brief history of the whole Lordship debate. I highly recommend these posts as worthy of your attention.

Oh, by the way, Phil Johnson is posting his own personal testimony of how he became involved in the lordship debate. He used to be on the other side of that debate, so it promises to also be a good series of posts.


∼striving for the unity of the faith for the glory of God∼ Eph. 4:3,13 “¢ Rom. 15:5-7

The Christian Life As a Race–Heb. 12:1-17

Run the Race

Hebrews 12:1-17 speaks of the Christian life as a race. Here are some thoughts concerning that race which were helpful in my Christian walk/race!

I. Pattern for our race.

A. OT Saints (chapter 11)

  • Ran it by faith
  • Endured hardship (self-chosen risk and external persecution)
  • Had a definite goal in view (Abraham = heavenly city; Moses = wealth/reward of Christ)

B. Christ (vs. 1-4)

  • Trusted the Father [had faith, in a sense] (“for the joy”; learned obedience)
  • Endured hardship (cross, shame, sinners, hostility, death)
  • Had a definite goal in view (joy; redeem a people for God)

II. Problem for our race.

A. We need faith

  • To see the witnesses
  • To see Jesus
  • To see the reward

B. We have obstacles

  • Weights (entanglements, see 2 Tim. 2:4)
  • Sins (besetting sins)

C. We have hardships

  • Requires endurance (v. 1)
  • Potential weariness (v. 3)
  • It is painful (v. 11)
  • Wears us out (v. 12)
  • Requires striving (v. 14)

III. Purpose of our race

A. Ultimate purpose

  • To win the prize (1 Cor. 9:24-27)
  • To gain Christ (Phil. 3)
  • To see the Lord (Heb. 12:14)

B. Progressive purposes

  • Our good (v. 10)
  • Share in his holiness (v. 10)
  • Fruit of righteousness (v. 11; Phil. 1:10-11)

IV. Perspective for our race

A. Our intensity/difficulty is really minor

  • Consider Christ (v. 3-4)

B. Our difficulty is to be welcomed not begrudged (v. 5-6)
C. No difficulty = no sonship (vs. 7-8]
D. God is working in this for our good (v. 9-10)
E. Our hardship is unpleasant but effective (v. 11)
F. Keep the pitfalls in view.

V. Pitfalls of our race

A. Potential to not see the Lord (v. 14)
B. Potential to fail to obtain grace (v. 15)
C. Potential to become or be poisoned by a “root of bitterness” (v. 15–also cf. Dt. 29:18ff. for the OT context of the phrase “root of bitterness”)
D. Potential to cross the line and be rejected finally (v. 16-17)

VI. Partners for our race

A. Brothers (and sisters) in Christ

  • Strive together (v. 14)
  • Help all (v. 15)
  • Prevent any (v. 16)
  • Also see Heb. 3:12-14 and 10:24-25

B. Christ (vs. 2)

The outline above should be sufficient for you to catch the gist of my thoughts on this passage. But let me expound on a few points so you better understand the outline. First, I take the “chastening” or “discipline” of verses 5 through 11 to be not so much God’s punishing us when we do evil as it is the whole difficulty involved in the sanctification process. What makes me conclude in this way? Well, verse 3-5 uses the concept of chastening to remind us to not view the race with a bad attitude. Verse 7 continues, “It is for discipline that you have to endure”. I see that as connected with the endurance mentioned in verse 2 and 3. In other words the whole Christian life–the race–requires endurance because it is God’s disciplining work. Verses 11-13 go back to the race metaphor again, showing that chastening should be viewed within that motif. Further, if chastening is done only to believers, and yet all the lost equally reap the bad results of their bad deeds, something different must be understood in the idea of chastening. I do not discount that an inward grief and struggle concerning sin is in view with this chastening, but it is only part of it and not the sum total of chastening.

Second, some of you may wonder what I am getting at under point number 5–the pitfalls. Feel free to consult a post dedicated strictly to this concept–the perseverance of the saints–entitled “Once Saved, Always Saved?!?!”. There I maintain that the warnings against apostasy are real and are used to help us become sanctified. In our race, we better remember that if at any time we give up, we may very well prove to have been a fake all along (1 Jn. 2:19). Only those who endure to the end will be saved, remember.

Bitterness and Desire: Reflections on Perseverance

A recent post and discussion over on Pyromaniacs blog, has me thinking again about perseverance. [See my recent look at the “Once Saved, Always Saved” doctrine here.] James Spurgeon is promising to post more on this topic there, with specific reference to the importance of church in the avoidance of apostasy as seen in Heb. 10:25. Just prior to reading that post (and the earlier one here) on perseverance, I started reading the book On the Mortification of Sin by John Owen (abridged/edited by Richard Rushing and published by Banner of Truth). Anyway, the last few days, it seems, this topic has been on my mind. As I already have mentioned I recently wrote a somewhat lengthy post about this issue, but I have a few more brief thoughts I would like to post here which may be helpful to some (they were to me).

To begin, I want to quote a verse which could easily have made it into my original post, had I remembered it when composing that. I think it makes clear the importance of perseverance. Hebrews 5:9 “And being made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him.” Also, with regards to my use of Rom. 2 concerning judgment, let me clarify. The only reason we are allowed in heaven is that our names are in the Lamb’s book of life. Jesus’ work on the cross is our ONLY hope of heaven. Yet, Jesus works in us through the Spirit’s sanctifying work to such a degree that everyone who enters heaven has good works to evidence that their faith was genuine. This is where passages like Rom. 2:6-11 and John 5:28-29 come in. This is not to say believers are not judged concerning their works with respect to varying degrees of reward, but I believe (along with Wayne Grudem–see his systematic theology) that there is one final judgment where the lost and saved together will stand before God (Matt. 25:31-46; Rev. 20:11-15). And at that time the saints will be rewarded while the lost will receive punishment see Rev. 11:18 (also concerning degrees of punishment for the lost see Luke 12:47-48; 20:47).Here would be a good time to point you to some further resources on the topic. First, be sure to read this short article by John Piper directed to pastors entitled “Brothers, Save the Saints”. Next, I would direct you to several articles at Desiring God listed here. Of course, you should read all or part of John Piper’s book Future Grace. I would also direct you to some further online resources available here, listed by Monergism.Com.

Now I would like to post a few quotes from Owen’s book which really apply to this discussion. On the Mortification of Sin is basically an extended (and very profitable, I might add) study of Rom. 8:13b “But if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live.” Let me first reproduce his outline of the verse:

  • 1) To whom it is directed: “You believers”.
  • 2) The condition: “If you”.
  • 3) The means of accomplishment: “The Spirit”.
  • 4) A duty: “Put to death the deeds of the body”.
  • 5) A promise: “You will live”.

Owen stresses that believers must be mortifying sin: “The choicest believers, who are assuredly freed from the condemning power of sin [see 8:1], should also make it their business all of their days to mortify the indwelling power of sin.” (pg. 2)

He then expounds on exactly how mortifying is a condition: “The purpose of the condition, ‘If you’, is to express the certainty of the relationship between the cure and the result. There is a clear connection between the mortifying of the deeds of the body and living. This connection is not cause and effect properly and strictly, for ‘eternal life is the gift of God through Jesus Christ’ (Rom. 6:23), but rather means and end. The intent of the text in this conditional expression is that there is a certain infallible connection and coherence between true mortification and eternal life: if you use this means, you shall obtain that end; if you do mortify, you shall live. This then, is our main motive for the enforcement of this duty in our lives.” (pg. 2)

Now comes some really interesting quotes concerning the false professor, the one who does not mortify sin:

“The basic characteristic of an unmortified course is the digestion of sin without bitterness in the heart. He who is able to swallow and digest daily sins in his life without conviction in the heart is at the very brink of turning the grace of God into lasciviousness, and being hardened by the deceitfulness of sin.” (pg. 11-12)

“From this door have gone out from us most of the professors that have apostatized in the days in which we live. For a while most of them were under conviction, and they ‘escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ’ (2 Pet. 2:20). But after having become acquainted with the doctrines of the gospel, they became weary of thir spiritual duties. They had no true desire for these and they allowed evil instead to lay hold of them, and speedily tumble them into perdition.” (pg. 12)

From the above two quotes, it is clear that Owen says two characteristics of false believers–those who profess only but do not possess–are no bitterness of heart over sin, and no true desire for holiness. Let us soberly examine our hearts in this light. May we pray that God would great us hearts that mourn over sin (Matt. 5:4) and that have a true desire for holiness.

I hope these various reflections on perseverance help you. Feel free to add more thoughts or questions in the comments here.


∼striving for the unity of the faith for the glory of God∼ Eph. 4:3,13 “¢ Rom. 15:5-7

Once Saved, Always Saved?!?!

Eternal Security, the get-out-of-jail-free card evangelicals carry enabling them to party and live it up with the 100% assurance that they will not face the wrath of God!NOTE: For an updated copy of this post, see the “Mining the Archives” post here.

Today’s popular evangelical maxim “once saved, always saved” while based in the Biblical truth of justification by faith alone has morphed into a virtual get-out-of-jail-free card for far too many. The church’s duty to make disciples of all nations has been downgraded to an optional extra. The gospel call to repent and believe has become a plea for sinners to assent to the facts of the gospel, pray a prayer, and join the cool Christian club called churchianity. Gone are the stern warnings to “watch and pray” and “endure to the end”. Gone are the bold exhortations to “make your calling and election sure” and “be diligent to be found in [Christ] without spot or blemish”. In their place are the warm assurances “since you confessed you are saved” and “since eternal life is a free gift, God cannot take it back”, and the friendly reminders “everybody makes mistakes” and “don’t sweat: remember, we’re under grace!” The old doctrine that saints must diligently make a personal effort to persevere in faith has been overshadowed by the new doctrine that saints can live just like anyone else in the world and as long as they once assented to gospel truths they are most certainly bound for heaven.

I wish I was merely exaggerating the situation. But when a nationally well known evangelical leader like Charles Stanley seriously believes and teaches that people who actually stop believing in Christ and walk out on God are still eternally secure, I can hardly be accused of overstating my case. In the article linked to above he claims, “The Bible clearly teaches that God’s love for His people is of such magnitude that even those who walk away from the faith have not the slightest chance of slipping from His hand.” He goes on to only deal with Eph. 2:4-9 and 1 Cor. 1:21, while adding in a good portion of reasoning and illustrations. In his book Eternal Security: Can You Be Sure? he makes the startling claim that salvation can be compared to receiving a tattoo. Even if moments later, you regret receiving the tattoo, it cannot change the fact that you have it! (pg. 80)

The Grace Evangelical Society exists to perpetuate such ideas. In other specters of evangelicalism, easy believism is represented by a 1-2-3-repeat-after-me approach to evangelism. A very large segment of independent fundamental Baptists (represented by literally thousands of churches and tens [if not hundreds] of thousands of members) emphasizes this approach to such excess that staggeringly huge numbers of salvations and baptisms are reported each year–which if really true, would make the Great Awakening look like a picnic. People are converted in five minutes or less–even through a rolled-down window during the duration of a stop light! One church has boasted of a milliion souls saved in the past 25 years, and yet less than 500 attend on any given Sunday.

Today no view seems criticized as much as Lordship Salvation or the Calvinistic doctrine of the Perseverance of the Saints. These views are very similar, if not synonomous and both share a strong critique. Charges of “works-salvation” or “perfectionism” are thrown mercilessly at these misunderstood views.

So how did we come to such a time and situation as this? It seems that in a mix of zeal and evangelistic fervor, popular Christianity began to move away from its confessional roots in the late 1800s. American individualism probably worsened the situation, as Sola Scriptura became the license for anyone and everyone to disregard centuries of theological formulations and church teaching and come up with a myriad of homespun theories. The lasting impact of Charles G. Finney, who rejected substitutionary atonement among other orthodox doctrines, also contributed to what became popular American revivalism. Today, people have hardly heard of many of the great Reformation confessions like the Westminster Confession or the Synod of Dort, and yet they are quick to find a proof text for a host of contradictory Biblical teachings.

Yet a misunderstanding of perseverance is not limited to Arminians and non-Calvinists today, either. Doug Wilson says it well in a recent post on Heb. 3:7-19:

Apostasy is a real sin, committed by real people. This is something that Arminians get, and that most Calvinists do not get. None of the elect can every [sic] be taken out of God’s electing and sovereign decree. This is something that Calvinists get, and that Arminians do not get. Arminians can read Romans 8 through 11 and not see the absolute sovereignty of God, which is something that never ceases to astonish me. But lest we Calvinists get on a high horse, Arminians can read though Hebrews and can see real apostasy there. There are few things more exegetically embarrassing than to hear a Calvinist talk about how the warnings are hypothetical, like “keep off the grass” signs in the middle of the Sahara. There are many things that can be said to this, but the most compelling of them is that the warnings invariably deny that they are anything like hypothetical….The sin warned against here is that of evil unbelief, pure and simple. Not only is it unbelief, it is unbelief resulting in apostasy — departure from the living God, falling away from the living God. The sin is spoken of in the sternest possible way — rebellion, hardened hearts, evil heart of unbelief, and a departure from God…..This book [Hebrews] is about the sin of apostasy. Can a Christian fall away? Yes. Can someone who is truly regenerate, elect of God, an eternal Christian, fall away? No, clearly not.

Before I go on to defend the Biblical (I believe) doctrine of perseverance, let me provide here a brief excerpt from John Piper’s book The Purifying Power of Living by Faith in Future Grace


A few years ago I spoke to a high school student body on how to fight lust. One of my points was called, “Ponder the eternal danger of lust.” I quoted the words of Jesus–that it’s better to go to heaven with one eye than to hell with two–and said to the students that their eternal destiny was at stake in what they did with their eyes and with the thoughts of their imagination….After my message…one of the students…asked, “Are you saying then that a person can lose his salvation?”…This is exactly the same response I got a few years ago when I confronted a man about the adultery he was living in….I pled with him to return to his wife. Then I said, “You know, Jesus says that if you don’t fight this sin with the kind of seriousness that is willing to gouge out your own eye, you will go to hell”….As a professing Christian he looked at me in utter disbelief, as though he had never heard anything like this in his life, and said, “You mean you think a person can lose his salvation?”…So I have learned again and again from firsthand experience that there are many professing Christians who have a view of salvation that disconnects it from real life, and that nullifies the threats of the Bible, and puts the sinning person who claims to be a Christian beyond the reach of biblical warnings. I believe this view of the Christian life is comforting thousands who are on the broad way that leads to destruction (Matthew 7:13)….The main concern of this book is to show that the battle against sin is a battle against unbelief. Or: the fight for purity is a fight for faith in future grace. The great error that I am trying to explode is the error that says, “Faith in God is one thing and the fight for holiness is another thing….The battle for obedience is optional because only faith is necessary for final salvation.” (pg. 330-331 and 333)

Belief in perseverance does not negate the great truth that faith alone justifies and secures our eternal salvation. Rather it affirms with Martin Luther, “We are saved by faith alone, but not a faith that is alone.” Our works prove the sincerity of our faith, and are in this sense necessary. This is why so many passages teach that God will actually judge all mankind by their works. Without exception, Rom. 2:6-11 states: “He will render to each one according to his works: to those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immorality, he will give eternal life; but for those who are self-seeking and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, there will be wrath and fury. There will be tribulation and distress for every human being who does evil, the Jew first and also the Greek, but glory and honor and peace for everyone who does good, the Jew first and also the Greek. For God shows no partiality.” The reason this does not teach works salvation is that when we come to God in faith (as a result of his work of regeneration in our hearts–John 1:13 and 1 Jn. 5:1, and his gifts of faith–Acts 3:16, 15:9, 18:27, 1 Pet. 1:21, Phil. 1:29, Eph. 1:19-20, 2 Pet. 1:1 and repentance–Acts 5:31, 11:18, 2 Tim. 2:25) he begins a good work in us (Phil. 1:6) and will be the One to complete it. He will produce good works in us as a testimony of the genuineness of our faith–Eph. 2:10, Phil. 2:13, 1 Cor. 15:10, 1 Thess. 5:23-24, Jude 24, Tit. 2:14.

In other words, true regeneration produces true fruit. This is Jesus’ teaching in Matt. 7:18-19 “A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.” In the parable of the sower, the only soil which produced fruit was the good soil. Even thought the rocky soil produced plants which looked healthier than the fruitful plants, they bore no fruit and withered away. Jesus said this represents those “who receive [the word] with joy…but…have no root: they believe for a while, and in time of testing fall away.” The clear teaching of the parable is that transient faith does not save. Only the faith that bears fruit saves.

In understanding perseverance, it is important to recognize the difference between justification and glorification. Justification is the legal pronouncement of “not guilty” which happens immediately upon our faith and is based on Christ’s substitutionary atonement. This pronouncement is a voice from heaven, so to speak, concerning our hearts. The testimony from earth (our lifestyle) does not unfalteringly reflect this. Sanctification is a slow and gradual process of the out-working of our faith and the living out of our justification. Glorification is the point when we are gloriously tranformed into Christ’s image immediately after our death. At this point salvation is final. Up until then, since we cannot enter heaven’s throneroom and hear the irreversible verdict of “not guilty” applied to us, we must trust in sanctification to prove the genuineness of our faith. The term “salvation” is most often used in Scripture to refer to our glorification and only sparingly used to refer to justification. So when we see the English words “whoever believes will be saved” it usually is teaching that whoever believes will one day ultimately be saved/glorified. The Greek tense used for “believe” most often (99% or more of the time) in such statements is the present tense which directly conveys a continual action. Literally, it is often stated, “the believing one will be saved”. If we walk away from faith and cease believing we prove to not be a “believing one”.

Perseverance is required of believers. It is our duty. But the flip side of this is the teaching that God will preserve His elect (John 10:26-30, 1 Pet. 1:5, etc.). So all of the elect–all the truly regenerate among professing believers–will persevere and it will be by God’s grace. Most reading this post already understand that God will preserve the elect, so I will not labor to prove that assertion. But what follows will conclude this post by providing a defense of my assertion that the Bible requires us (professing believers) to persevere.

The Bible speaks of our need to “examine” ourselves (2 Cor. 13:5) and to diligently “make our calling and election sure” (2 Pet. 1:10). We cannot assume that since we believed in the past or made some profession of faith, we are absolutely and inviolably secure eternally. We must make room for the Scriptural potential that our faith could be insincere or not genuine. Luke 8:13 again, speaks of those who “believe for a while, and in time of testing fall away”. Even Paul leaves it open that he might even still yet become a “castaway” (same Greek word for apostate) in 1 Cor. 9:27.

Heb. 3:12-14 (along with other warning passages in Hebrews) is emphatically clear that we might ultimately fall away, and so thus we need to daily exhort one another to continue in belief. Paul calls this the “good fight of faith” in 1 Tim. 6:12 and exhorts Timothy to “take hold of the eternal life” (6:12) and to “hold faith” (1:19), because some had already “made shipwreck of their faith” (1:20), and some have “abandoned their former faith” (5:12), and others have “swerved from the faith” (6:21). This is why he exhorts Timothy to “Keep a close watch on yourself and on the teaching. Persist in this, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers.” (4:16) This is why so often Paul and other Scriptural authors do not boldly assure their readers of their personal sharing in Christ, rather they hold out before them their duty to persevere. See all the conditional statements in the following verses: Col. 1:23–“if indeed you continue in the faith, stable and steadfast,…”; 1 Cor. 15:2–“by which [the gospel] you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you–unless you believed in vain”; Heb. 3:6–“and we are his house if indeed we hold fast our confidence and our boasting in our hope”; Heb. 3:14–“we share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original confidence firm to the end”; John 8:31–“if you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples”; Mark 13:13–“the one who endures to the end will be saved”; 2 Tim. 2:12–“if we endure, we will also reign with him”; Rom. 8:13–“if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live”; Gal. 6:9–“in due season we will reap [eternal life (see 6:8)], if we do not give up”; Heb. 12:14–“holiness without which no one will see the Lord”; James 2:26 (with 14)–“faith apart from works is dead” and “can that faith save him?”

Scripture never gives us assurance of salvation based on our profession of faith (in a past time and place), rather it declares the objective reality of Christ’s work and the subjective reality of the Spirit’s work in our lives as the grounds for assurance. (And the stress in 1 John is on our subjective experience of characteristic obedience.) 1 John 2:3 states ” And by this we know that we have come to know him, if we keep his commandments.” 1 John 2:19 also gives us the key to understanding this truth. It helps us to interpret what happened when we see someone who seemed to have genuine faith fall away. It declares, “They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. But they weent out, that it might become plain that they all are not of us.” In other words, we should not conclude like some Arminians that all professing believers who fall away have in fact lost their salvation. Rather we should conclude that they were only professing but not possessing faith. Paul teaches this same truth when he declares belief could be in vain (1 Cor. 15:2) or could be only temporary (see 1 Thess. 3:5). Jesus also clearly taught both the reality of professors being proven to not possess faith in the scary passage of Matt. 7:21-23, and the need to persevere in Luke 21:34-36 among other places.

To sum up the teaching of perseverance, let us quote 2 passages. 2 Thess. 2:13b “God chose you as the firstfruits to be saved, through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth.” Heb. 6:12b “be…imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises.” Both of these passages teach that ultimate, final salvation (inheriting the promises) come to those who both believe and persevere (are sanctified/have patience).

But should this teaching result in our condemning large segments of evangelicalism and condemning many we know? Are we to judge them as not being true possessors since we may doubt their perseverance? No! Emphatically, no! Remember, justification is a heavenly sentence. We do not know, here on earth, what that sentence is. We can judge based on their fruits, but we also must be aware of the motes and beams in our own eyes. We should judge ourselves first and others much later. We can have confidence and hope in our sovereign God that there are evidences of grace in all who profess salvation. But then again, we know Biblically that this is most likely not the case. So rather than condemn one another, we should seek to edify one another and encourage them to press on, and to continue in belief (Heb. 3:2-14 and Gal. 6:1-9).

Before I close, we must revisit that popular maxim, “once saved, always saved.” If “saved” is viewed as glorification, I do not disagree at all with that statement. Nor would I if “saved” is viewed as justification. But once again, the proof of the pudding is in the eating, and the proof of justification is in your works (James 2). So even with the truth of once justified, always justified in view, we must never assume we have been justified if we have no good works to point to as Spirit-wrought proof.

In conclusion, brothers and sisters, I say with the apostle John “Watch yourselves, so that you may not lose what we have worked for, but may win a full reward.” (2 John 1:8) And remember that although Jude warns us to “Keep yourselves in the love of God, waiting for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ that leads to eternal life” (v. 21) he also assures us “Now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you blameless before the presence of his glory with great joy…” (v. 24). So do not lose heart. Trust in God’s great promises, and fight the good fight of faith. Above all, do not presume that you have arrived and are outside the bounds of Scripture’s warnings. Rather, “be all the more diligent to make your calling and election sure, for if you practice these qualities you will never fall.” (2 Pet. 1:10)

For a more succinct treatment of this topic, I refer you to an earlier post where I reproduce an outline by my brother Dave on Heb. 3:2-14. Also, for a Biblical look at how important mutual edification of believers is, see my post on 1 Thessalonians. And for more resources concerning this topic, check out some articles and sermons by John Piper listed here on the issue of future grace, or just read his book referenced above. [The last link above was added 2/13/06.]

For further thoughts on this topic check out a more recent post here.

picture was borrowed from here.